<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sean Combs</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Steve Lake</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on.<br />
Steve Lake at the Nyc News headquarters.  Back to you Lilith<br />
The only poster who had his account banned 4 times without ever breaking any rules each of those times.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/100463/the-first-charge-on-racketeering-they-are-deadlocked-on</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:41:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/100463.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Hepocles</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Women ruin everything, neebur<br />
Especially gay clubs<br />
Alba gu bràth</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959568</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959568</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>_dot</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Im still not sure why he's being charged. He's just gay and a freak. The stuff that the witnesses talked about in their testimonies sounds like how I imagine a typical night after the gay club goes, minus having women involved.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959567</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959567</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MiniMasterpieceTheater</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 02, 2025 12:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">anything is possible i suppose<br />
Cold comfort for change? Did you exchange<br />
A walk-on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959566</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959566</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lilith</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But he has to meet only two of eight claims, right? They judged him on all eight and still came to a deadlock on all of them, thus "no" on everything related to racketeering?  Does this mean he may end up with a mistrial?  I don't know how they could've come to that after learning of all the transactions.<br />
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959565</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959565</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MiniMasterpieceTheater</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yes RICO are racketeering charges<br />
Cold comfort for change? Did you exchange<br />
A walk-on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959564</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959564</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lilith</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I get a sick feeling that Jay Z has been able to buy his way out of trouble. He's been mentioned way too many times as being involved but somehow, he seems to escape unscathed.<br />
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959563</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959563</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Steve Lake</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jay Z is just as big of a scumbag. Jay Z should be next . Then Fat Joe<br />
The only poster who had his account banned 4 times without ever breaking any rules each of those times.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959562</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959562</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lilith</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Do you think someone will take his place and these events will still keep happening? Or are "they" on the move to take everyone out with collateral, like they did with Epstein, Weinstein and now Diddy?<br />
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959561</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959561</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Steve Lake</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wanna wait until the verdicts are announced. But I will say this. Even if they dont get him on Racketeering, he will still go away for a very very long time.<br />
He's finished.<br />
The only poster who had his account banned 4 times without ever breaking any rules each of those times.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959560</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959560</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The first charge.  On Racketeering they are deadlocked on. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Lilith</strong> — <em>9 months ago(July 01, 2025 10:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just saw a video that said they reached a "partial verdict" but I haven't watched the video itself yet. I need to look at what's being reported.<br />
If they can't get him on racketeering, does that mess up the chances to get him for RICO charges?<br />
This guy is guilty as sin. I was really afraid there was going to be some jury tampering going on just based on the behaviour of needing to get an alternate juror and then the two notes sent out to the judge. It's fishy.<br />
"Your emotional state is not my responsibility." – Warren Smith</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959559</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/959559</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:41:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>