<![CDATA[Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Frances Fisher

Montserrat23 — 14 years ago(April 05, 2012 01:29 PM)

Wow! She'll turn 60 in May and she looks way better now than at the time of "Titanic"; she's a good actress, often underrated by the way. I wonder how much work she's done to her face (great surgeon if she went under the knife).
She reminds me of another actress or someone famous, but I can't find who. If anyone can help me.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101261/is-60-the-new-40-only-for-some-peopleRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 08:55:22 GMTThu, 16 Apr 2026 03:31:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people… on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:44 GMT]]>kascha-klaussen — 10 years ago(October 09, 2015 07:37 PM)

Yeah that's what I was going to say. They look a lot alike.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965157https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965157Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people… on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:36 GMT]]>Axelbaxter — 12 years ago(January 11, 2014 10:25 PM)

Maybe a little like Lauren Holly?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965156https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965156Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people… on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:27 GMT]]>OrdinaryDay — 12 years ago(December 23, 2013 06:23 PM)

what lots of money and plastic surgery does to reverse the natural aging process.
Definition of troll on IMDb - anyone who expresses a view different to mine.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965155https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965155Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people… on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:16 GMT]]>getstuck77 — 12 years ago(September 12, 2013 05:14 PM)

You should see her in Valley of Elah.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965154https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965154Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people… on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:02 GMT]]>smcbee27 — 12 years ago(April 14, 2013 11:39 AM)

I'm watching her on Eureka right now. She is so poised and stunning. I imagine she looks older in Titanic because that's what the character called for. I've also noticed her age transforms with hair cuts and color. The dark hair colors don't look as good. Her photos on here show how gorgeous she is. Especially when sporting certain lighter reds and hair cuts. I don't get why so many on here are so displeased with her. She's talented, beautiful and has a certain poise about her I just really like.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965153https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965153Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:32:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is 60 the new 40? Only for some people… on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:31:53 GMT]]>Bel_Zedar — 13 years ago(August 08, 2012 12:20 PM)

She was in Becker in 2000 and I've just seen one of the episodes. She first caught my attention as the glamorous fox in Eureka, 8 years alter.
I'd say she looked 15 years younger in Eureka than she had in Becker, nearly a decade earlier.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965152https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/965152Thu, 16 Apr 2026 03:31:53 GMT