<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;Jack and Jill&quot;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Katie Holmes</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bijinius</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 03, 2015 11:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She completely should have won that Razzie for "Worst Supporting Actress". by a WIDE margin. I couldn't believe how bad she was; of course she was given next-to-nothing to work with she was totally one of the most useless, horribly sexist portrayal of a woman on screen. She stares blankly at the screen, looking tired and boooored.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101613/jack-and-jill</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:17:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101613.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:47:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to &quot;Jack and Jill&quot; on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:47:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>chrisamon</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 16, 2016 12:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"Jack and Jill"<br />
If that were she and I going up the hill, I'd gladly let her come down with the $2.50.<br />
Sometimes ya gotta wonder.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/967421</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/967421</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:47:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>