<![CDATA[She completely should have won that Razzie for "Worst Supporting Actress". by a WIDE margin. I couldn't believe how bad]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Katie Holmes

bijinius — 11 years ago(January 03, 2015 11:20 AM)

She completely should have won that Razzie for "Worst Supporting Actress". by a WIDE margin. I couldn't believe how bad she was; of course she was given next-to-nothing to work with she was totally one of the most useless, horribly sexist portrayal of a woman on screen. She stares blankly at the screen, looking tired and boooored.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101614/she-completely-should-have-won-that-razzie-for-worst-supporting-actress-by-a-wide-margin-i-couldn-t-believe-how-badRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 10:04:40 GMTThu, 16 Apr 2026 05:47:18 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to She completely should have won that Razzie for "Worst Supporting Actress". by a WIDE margin. I couldn't believe how bad on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:47:19 GMT]]>chrisamon — 9 years ago(August 16, 2016 12:52 PM)

"Jack and Jill"
If that were she and I going up the hill, I'd gladly let her come down with the $2.50.
Sometimes ya gotta wonder.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/967423https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/967423Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:47:19 GMT