<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[She&#x27;s doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kate Hudson</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Gf6</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 12, 2016 02:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She's doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101725/she-s-doing-roles-suited-for-women-a-whole-decade-older-than-her</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:37:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101725.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to She&#x27;s doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kayleewheat</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 25, 2016 02:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Kate Hudson is really pretty.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968172</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968172</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to She&#x27;s doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>throughtheeyes</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 27, 2016 11:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love her ass. Tastes and stuff.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968171</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968171</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to She&#x27;s doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>caroleanne</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 02, 2016 01:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What?? She's gorgeous!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968170</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968170</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to She&#x27;s doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nikkiten1979</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 02, 2016 06:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You mean went up 30%?? She's ridiculously pretty waaaay better than in her 20s.<br />
can't outrun your own shadow</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968169</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968169</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to She&#x27;s doing roles suited for women a whole decade older than her on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>statman122</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 19, 2016 12:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And rightfully so.  Her "hotness factor" has slipped at least 30%.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968168</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968168</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 05:58:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>