<![CDATA[but pretty nonetheless.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kate Hudson

suesmith3 — 12 years ago(September 25, 2013 12:46 PM)

but pretty nonetheless.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/101744/but-pretty-nonethelessRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 13:35:59 GMTThu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:24 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to but pretty nonetheless. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:27 GMT]]>theclaimsofames — 10 years ago(January 24, 2016 10:38 PM)

This member has posted the same Arija Bareikis nonsense on many, MANY actresses' pages. Very strange.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968275https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968275Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to but pretty nonetheless. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:26 GMT]]>Goatlips — 11 years ago(May 15, 2014 07:01 AM)

*Women

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968274https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968274Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to but pretty nonetheless. on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:25 GMT]]>Goatlips — 11 years ago(May 15, 2014 07:00 AM)

I just had the misfortune of looking up Arija Bareikis on here - ew! Kate Hudson is flat-faced and needs an eye-wrangler like Uma Thurman, but that Bareikis thing looks like one of those prematurely aged kids, but with freckles!
Woman have no idea about what looks attractive. I think they convince themselves that uglies are pretty to feel better about themself. e.g. No woman would ever say Cheryl Cole was beautiful.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968273https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/968273Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:00:25 GMT