<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Sharon, Gail O&#x27;Grady and Jean Smart]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sharon Lawrence</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>sharon-17</strong> — <em>12 years ago(June 29, 2013 12:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">These women have always seemed 15 years older than they actually are, in my opinion. I seem to bundle them all in the same category. Each one is entirely interchangeable to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/103137/sharon-gail-o-grady-and-jean-smart</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:20:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/103137.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:18 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sharon, Gail O&#x27;Grady and Jean Smart on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>samrose66</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 31, 2016 07:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree, for the record.  1961?  She is gorgeous but she has played middle age type since was in my 20s, and I just turned 50.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978425</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978425</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sharon, Gail O&#x27;Grady and Jean Smart on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>srklondie</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 15, 2015 05:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Shallow comments from shallow people.  You seem to be pretty mean-spirited.  It has to be kind of tough being you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978424</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978424</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sharon, Gail O&#x27;Grady and Jean Smart on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>existenze2003</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 08, 2014 05:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Interchangeable as to which one works the camera while I plow the other two you mean</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978423</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sharon, Gail O&#x27;Grady and Jean Smart on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vanity6_2000</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 02, 2014 08:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I get what you're saying.<br />
They're not old but it feels like they've been around forever. Ultra-mature types.<br />
I swore Gail o Grady was pushing 50 when I saw her on a Vh1 movie in the 90s.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sharon, Gail O&#x27;Grady and Jean Smart on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978421</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/978421</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:39:19 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>