<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Such an astonishingly good looking woman]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jane Seymour</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>barjo4</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 16, 2016 09:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No matter how you categorize her looks, she is and was always fabulous. I am 71 and I always felt that way bout her.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/105083/such-an-astonishingly-good-looking-woman</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 10:05:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/105083.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:55:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Such an astonishingly good looking woman on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:55:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Leopheard</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 17, 2016 04:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She's unbelievable. How can someone just look so good continually? She's almost 66!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/991711</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/991711</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:55:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>