<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cheap  looking &quot;jewelry&quot;. The opening could also let love slip out. Since we&#x27;re being metaphorical, here.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jane Seymour</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jerseyd1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 27, 2016 07:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Cheap  looking "jewelry". The opening could also let love slip out. Since we're being metaphorical, here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/105090/cheap-looking-jewelry-the-opening-could-also-let-love-slip-out-since-we-re-being-metaphorical-here</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 07:12:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/105090.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 11:55:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>