<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[creepy and boring]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jonathan Tucker</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>tuezdayweld</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 09, 2015 01:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">unusual combination.  I wonder how half of these paint by numbers actors get work</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/106708/creepy-and-boring</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:47:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/106708.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:57:11 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to creepy and boring on Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:57:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ace_Sax</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 26, 2015 11:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I figure once you get a half decent agent you'll always get work of some sort. I mean it's not like the guy is starring in blockbusters or award winning movies and nor should he.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1004033</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1004033</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:57:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>