<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It&#x27;s a tremendous shame t111chat this great character actor is being remembered solely based on his appearance in that p]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Patrick Cranshaw</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>soylentgreen-1</strong> — <em>20 years ago(January 02, 2006 04:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's a tremendous shame t111chat this great character actor is being remembered solely based on his appearance in that piece of crap OLD SCHOOL.<br />
Despite being comprised of mostly secondary roles, his body of work is light-years more diverse than anything Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise could aspire to.<br />
Like the March violets that popped up after Rosa Parks passed away, y'all have the same profoundly hollow platitudes to offer that morons burp up when someone dies, but you didn't have too much to say when they were alive.  Sickening bandwagoners!<br />
You, Mr Neville, are the refuse of the past.  You are discarded!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/114041/it-s-a-tremendous-shame-t111chat-this-great-character-actor-is-being-remembered-solely-based-on-his-appearance-in-that-p</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 06:52:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/114041.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 05:07:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>