<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Sawyer and Coco?!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Diane Farr</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>esskayess</strong> — <em>17 years ago(August 28, 2008 11:23 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Two more stupid Hollywood kid names among the living.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/116436/sawyer-and-coco</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:35:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/116436.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:11:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sawyer and Coco?! on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:11:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>agentbach</strong> — <em>17 years ago(March 09, 2009 11:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">actually, it sounds a lot more dignifying then most Hollywood names.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1064005</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1064005</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 10:11:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>