<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ok I&#x27;ve seen two different years listed as her year of birth. I&#x27;ve seen 1971, like it says on Imdb and I&#x27;ve seen 1972, l]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Katie Finneran</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>kc12286</strong> — <em>19 years ago(May 18, 2006 01:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ok I've seen two different years listed as her year of birth. I've seen 1971, like it says on Imdb and I've seen 1972, like it says on <a href="http://Tv.com" rel="nofollow ugc">Tv.com</a> and Internet Brodway Database. Anyone know which one is correct?<br />
For of all sad words of tongue or pen, The saddest are these: 'It might have been!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/117021/ok-i-ve-seen-two-different-years-listed-as-her-year-of-birth-i-ve-seen-1971-like-it-says-on-imdb-and-i-ve-seen-1972-l</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 13:52:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/117021.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:19:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>