<![CDATA[She's fugly, not attractive at all and she]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Maggie Gyllenhaal

residentevil6901 — 9 years ago(November 16, 2016 03:12 PM)

ruined Batman. She reminds me of an ugly polygamists wife. That's what she looks like to me.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/119044/she-s-fugly-not-attractive-at-all-and-sheRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 10:05:24 GMTFri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:45 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to She's fugly, not attractive at all and she on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:50 GMT]]>residentevil6901 — 9 years ago(January 19, 2017 10:40 AM)

I'd rather have had Katie Holmes in the sequel to keep things consistent. She's at least prettier then Maggie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078062https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078062Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to She's fugly, not attractive at all and she on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:49 GMT]]>ShallowAl69 — 9 years ago(January 18, 2017 12:44 PM)

ruined Batman
?!
Not as much as that mongoloid Katie Holmes did

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078061https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078061Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to She's fugly, not attractive at all and she on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:47 GMT]]>residentevil6901 — 9 years ago(January 06, 2017 06:35 PM)

Sure why not after all you don't
beep
her face. Lol
But I would kick her out of bed afterward.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078060https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078060Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to She's fugly, not attractive at all and she on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:46 GMT]]>Xaccah — 9 years ago(December 21, 2016 07:03 AM)

I bet if she sat on your face you'll stick your tongue out

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078059https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078059Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:05:46 GMT