<![CDATA[by all the hate for her face. Just because she might not be a fashion model in no way makes her ugly. She's an attract]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Maggie Gyllenhaal

mmitsos-1 — 9 years ago(May 07, 2016 12:00 PM)

by all the hate for her face. Just because she might not be a fashion model in no way makes her ugly. She's an attractive woman, period. Small nose, pretty eyes, straight teeth, and she's even thin.
One woman I do "hate on" is Catherine Zera Jones, because she has continually, both in print and in live interviews, srated how gorgeous she THINKS she is, which, in and of itself alone makes her very ugly. But beyond that, HER face has always been very overrated for being pretty when in fact she looks like she was born with fetal alcohol syndrome.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/119077/by-all-the-hate-for-her-face-just-because-she-might-not-be-a-fashion-model-in-no-way-makes-her-ugly-she-s-an-attractRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 04:35:17 GMTFri, 17 Apr 2026 15:15:42 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to by all the hate for her face. Just because she might not be a fashion model in no way makes her ugly. She's an attract on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:15:44 GMT]]>jadzau — 9 years ago(July 23, 2016 08:42 AM)

sometimes Hollywood-standard 'beauty' does not make a person attractive. e.g Seymour Hoffman - in no way a standard Hollywood heart-throb but all the same enticing and attractive because of his talent and personality. Same with Maggie - not a 'quoted' beauty like your example C.Z. Jones, but captivating in her own way. There's something about her that is not skin-deep.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078527https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078527Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:15:44 GMT