<![CDATA[There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Maggie Gyllenhaal

amormortua — 11 years ago(January 17, 2015 12:41 AM)

Gyllenhaal is an example of an actress, which shows that this rule no longer applies.cause she's ugly and oddly self-satisfied, which makes her plainly repulsive.
"The Dark Knight" had, probably, the least attractive female character in the history of comic book movies (which had to affect ticket sales is some way, but apparently no one sees a problem there).
She's a proof that what counts in the end is jewish blood.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/119096/there-was-a-time-when-actresses-were-at-least-prettyRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 01:23:43 GMTFri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:21 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:43 GMT]]>sweiland75 — 10 years ago(August 15, 2015 09:18 PM)

If Jewish people have priority in Hollywood then why would she legally change her first name to something more gentile sounding?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078668https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078668Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:42 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078667https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078667Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:41 GMT]]>srklondie — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 10:57 PM)

I never said she was

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078666https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078666Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:40 GMT]]>yajji — 10 years ago(July 22, 2015 10:54 PM)

But she's not even ugly

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078665https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078665Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:38 GMT]]>srklondie — 10 years ago(July 15, 2015 12:21 AM)

It's hard to believe that you beat out a million other sperm.
By the way, who're you dating latelyyour left or your right palm?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078664https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078664Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:37 GMT]]>mszafar — 10 years ago(July 08, 2015 11:24 AM)

I agree. She is the most beautiful lady I have ever seen. Her smile specially is such joy for my heart

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078663https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078663Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:36 GMT]]>River_7 — 10 years ago(July 08, 2015 06:57 AM)

She's very talented actress and Naturally beautiful woman.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078662https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078662Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:35 GMT]]>chamohlamb — 10 years ago(June 04, 2015 12:07 PM)

But she's not ugly. I'd also add that even the least attractive actor or actress is more attractive than most of the hideous faces I see each day walking the streets in real life.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078661https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078661Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:34 GMT]]>rascal67 — 10 years ago(May 28, 2015 01:17 AM)

cause she's ugly and oddly self-satisfied, which makes her plainly repulsive.

She is 'average' looking, not 'ugly'. I think her face, is quite pleasant. As for her acting talent, don't really know; but she does have an Oscar nomination under her belt.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078660https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078660Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:32 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078659https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078659Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:31 GMT]]>dbrockskk1 — 11 years ago(February 06, 2015 04:38 PM)

hey a real antiSemite! I've heard about ya'll but I've never come across one of you!
suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078658https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078658Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:30 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078657https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078657Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:28 GMT]]>elrando — 11 years ago(February 06, 2015 08:36 AM)

Dude, do you really think that the problem with actresses right now is that they're not pretty enough? Are you kidding me? Every actress has to look like a supermodel in order to make it. The real problem is that theirs not enough down to earth looking actresses. Do you think that Sissy Spacek or Shelly Duvall could've made it in todays Hollywood climate?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078656https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078656Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:27 GMT]]>gardensplus-215-604903 — 10 years ago(June 12, 2015 04:01 PM)

She was fine in Nanny mcphee. So has your argument changed that because its a childrens film its somehow not worthy. Presumably Mary poppins is also rubbish in your book, or does it hold pleasant childhood memories and is therefore acceptable. Oh and of course julie andrews isnt jewish is she.
As a previous poster said " the honourable woman " is a238 brilliant performance. It's 4 hrs plus of dialogue heavy drama, with very few explosions, or gratuitous nudity so I doubt it's to your taste.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078655https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078655Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:26 GMT]]>indymovies — 11 years ago(February 06, 2015 12:26 PM)

In which picture that "incredible talent" of hers is detectable?
"Secretary" for one.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078654https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078654Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:25 GMT]]>StellaDarko — 11 years ago(January 17, 2015 04:59 PM)

In which picture that "incredible talent" of hers is detectable?
The Honorable Woman.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078653https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078653Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:24 GMT]]>amormortua — 11 years ago(January 17, 2015 02:37 PM)

In which picture that "incredible talent" of hers is detectable?
"Nanny McPhee and the Big Bang"?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078652https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078652Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to There was a time, when actresses were at least pretty… on Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:22 GMT]]>gardensplus-215-604903 — 11 years ago(January 17, 2015 12:54 PM)

Or it could be that she's an incredibly talented actress who chooses interesting projects. But a bigot wouldn't consider that

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078651https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1078651Fri, 17 Apr 2026 15:18:22 GMT