<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[MAGA Sen. Chuck Grassley Says Donald Trump Isn&#x27;t Following The Law]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Soapbox</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>/.ㅤ</strong> — <em>1 year ago(February 13, 2025 04:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">“I’d like to alert the president to the fact that he can abide by the law and still get rid of the people he wants to get rid of,” Grassley said. “He can put them on administrative leave for 30 days and send us a letter.”<br />
Dear President Trump:<br />
We write to you today concerning the reported firing of Inspectors General (IGs) from 18<br />
offices.1 Congress was not provided the legally required 30-day notice and case-specific reasons<br />
for removal, as required by law.2 Accordingly, we request that you provide that information<br />
immediately.<br />
On December 23, 2022, the “James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for<br />
Fiscal Year 2023” was signed into law and included provisions from the Securing Inspector<br />
General Independence Act, which was introduced by a bipartisan group of members.3 Those<br />
provisions require that the President “shall” communicate to Congress in writing 30 days before<br />
removing or transferring an IG from office the “substantive rationale, including detailed and<br />
case-specific reasons” for the removal or transfer.4 The law also prohibits an IG from being<br />
placed on non-duty status during the 30-day period preceding the date of removal or transfer<br />
unless the continued presence of the Inspector General in the workplace poses a threat as<br />
described by requirements in the Administrative Leave Act and the President submits a report to<br />
Congress.5<br />
While IGs aren’t immune from committing acts requiring their removal, and they can be<br />
removed by the president, the law must be followed.6 The communication to Congress must<br />
contain more than just broad and vague statements, rather it must include sufficient facts and<br />
details to assure Congress and the public that the termination is due to real concerns about the<br />
Inspector General’s ability to carry out their mission.7<br />
This is a matter of public and congressional accountability and ensuring the public’s<br />
confidence in the Inspector General community, a sentiment shared more broadly by other<br />
Members of Congress. IGs are critical to rooting out waste, fraud, abuse, and misconduct within<br />
the Executive Branch bureaucracy, which you have publicly made clear you are also intent on<br />
doing.<br />
Accordingly, we request that you provide Congress with a written communication that<br />
contains the “substantive rationale, including detailed and case-specific reasons” for each of the<br />
IG’s removed. Further, we request the name of each official that will serve in an acting capacity<br />
and that you work quickly to nominate qualified and non-partisan individuals to serve in these<br />
open positions.<br />
My password is password.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/12149/maga-sen-chuck-grassley-says-donald-trump-isn-t-following-the-law</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 14:06:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/12149.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:38:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to MAGA Sen. Chuck Grassley Says Donald Trump Isn&#x27;t Following The Law on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:38:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HollyJollyHanukka</strong> — <em>1 year ago(February 13, 2025 05:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Asking an insane person to be reasonable. Plus he’s a convicted felon, so -<br />
If you can’t say something nice, say something clever but devastating.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/114841</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/114841</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 07:38:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>