<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Alexander Armstrong is Danger Mouse: Pointless host voices rodent]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — David Jason</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mikekaraoke23</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 20, 2014 02:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/alexander-armstrong-danger-mouse-pointless" rel="nofollow ugc">www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/alexander-armstrong-danger-mouse-pointless</a> -4278350<br />
thoughts? I don't know why they are bothering they should just leave it alone, if this is for the new generation they can watch the classic old ones like I did like Scooby doo etc<br />
I don't like the updated Danger Mouse, but I think Penfold looks alright though</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/121575/alexander-armstrong-is-danger-mouse-pointless-host-voices-rodent</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 07:56:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/121575.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 20:34:48 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>