<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Jim&#x27;s Back!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jim Kelly</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>leeferdude</strong> — <em>21 years ago(October 31, 2004 11:33 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jim's back in a new Nike commercial with Lebron James. He is the leader of a bunch of Kung Fu dudes.<br />
<a href="http://www.nike.com/nikebasketball/usa/v3/features/chamber_of_fear//downloads/wallpaper_envy.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nike.com/nikebasketball/usa/v3/features/chamber_of_fear//downloads/wallpaper_envy.jpg</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/123281/jim-s-back</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 05:04:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/123281.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Vibradiant</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 03, 2013 05:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Your disparaging remarks about Gandolfini in that "considered debate" are plenty comprehensible, all within the false pretense of respect.  Very nice.  Recognizing the possibility I'd misjudged you, I looked at your profile and at random, immediately found a post calling a recently deceased, magnanimous individual a greedy glutton, a seemingly pertinent fact considering the issue at hand.<br />
And yes, your original post in this thread was exactly "a glib off-the-cuff remark".  That was my point all along.  Within a day of his passing, you tried to be a comedian about a sobering loss.  It screamed for equal disrespect, and you can't handle the result.<br />
"I like to watch"<br />
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104403</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104403</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chanpuru</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 03, 2013 05:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Good work Vibradiant. I bow to your insightfulness, you really got me with that well formulated argument.oh no wait a minute, you're just a tedious little bore who has completely missed the point. Not just missed the point but also run off to another thread desperate for ammunition and instead taken comments completely out of context and missed their point entirely!<br />
Comprehension doesn't appear to be your strong point unless you're being deliberately obtuse to be irritating i.e a troll. I said RIP in a thread about a Jim Kelly comeback and criticised the American media (not Gandolfini you'll note) for it's coverage of his death. The Jim comment was a glib off-the-cuff remark (until you started yapping at my heels) but the Gandolfini thread became a considered debate with a point to make, all of which is there to be read and either agreed or disagreed with by anyone interested in the details.<br />
Ah, but I used a naughty word didn't I.'details'. People like you don't like to get bogged down in things like details, context and understanding. It's better to just set a course, stick your fingers in your ears and do your best to ignore anything to the contrary that doesn't suit your narrative.<br />
For what it's worth, I'm a fan of Jim Kelly and Gandolfini but guess what.Jim's often dreamed of comeback has tragically been dashed along with our hopes and Gandolfini died in non mysterious circumstances due to his excessive consumption. Not too controversial a position to take I would have thought. Those two comments shouldn't be too hard to grasp.<br />
If you're still confused don't bother responding because this is just pointless and quite honestly a bit boring.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Vibradiant</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 03, 2013 12:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You asked if Gandolfini was taking his cocaine with a side order of lead, as well as this little gem:<br />
Bringing this back to Gandolfini, he may have just been a glutton. No excuses, no underlying cause he was just greedy and didn't care.<br />
Given these details, what exactly am I making up about the fact that you like to talk sh!t about dead people?  Should I "walk on eggshells" with regards to your lack of respect?<br />
And again, coming to a thread which once celebrated Jim's reentry into some level of media involvement nearly a decade ago within hours of his death with the glib commentary "eh, no he's not" pretty well shows what a mean-spirited, denial-based fool you apparently are.<br />
Good luck with that and your grade-school insults.<br />
"I like to watch"<br />
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104401</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104401</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chanpuru</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 03, 2013 02:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You really need to read things more carefully. I know that details are something you're not particularly interested in, but they're kind of important you know. Oh well, umm would you like me to say something else or would you prefer to just make stuff up and pretend I said it?<br />
Appparently saying Jim won't be making a comeback RIP is the same as urinating on someone's gravestone. What a funny world you live in.<br />
Ohand get back in your hole, bed-wetter.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104400</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104400</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Vibradiant</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 02, 2013 05:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Don't you have a dead person to mock?  Cirque du Soleil just lost an acrobat, or there's all those firefighters who tragically died in Arizona.  Of course theirs weren't slow and painful ends, but I'm sure you can come up with something.<br />
Added:  I see you've been busy trashing Gandolfini under the auspices of respect.  Kind of a pattern for you.<br />
"I like to watch"<br />
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104399</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104399</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chanpuru</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 02, 2013 12:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Clearly you are exactly the idiot that I described you as. Thanks for confirming.<br />
Now get back in your hole.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104398</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104398</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Vibradiant</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 02, 2013 09:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Clearly you're upset to have been called out for being a jack@$$.  Good luck with that.<br />
"I like to watch"<br />
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104397</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104397</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chanpuru</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 02, 2013 08:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh get over yourself you pretentious idiot. I've already said it wasn't a jibe it was just a comment. I've deleted it. but as for you, you can just crawl back into your hole and stop being so unnecessarily touchy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104396</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104396</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:52:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Vibradiant</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 02, 2013 07:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Eh, what else could be your point by posting a such a tasteless comment on a thread started by a fan 9 years ago when there are plenty of "RIP" to which to which threads to contribute?  Do you really think you're providing new information, and does the same idiocy prevent you from seeing the crass taunt implied?<br />
"I like to watch"<br />
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104395</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104395</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Chanpuru</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 02, 2013 02:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Whoa!! Calm down. Didn't mean it like that. I meant it in the sense that any come back that his fans had been hoping for is now not going to happen. Hence the "RIP".</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104394</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104394</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Vibradiant</strong> — <em>12 years ago(July 01, 2013 10:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto"><em>beep</em> you, dip$hit.  Since you know the OP was posted back in '04 for a Nike commercial, you know it had nothing to do with recent events.  Only soulless bits of putrefied fecal matter seek to make jokes at the expense of others' suffering and loss, esp when the body hasn't even yet grown cold.<br />
"I like to watch"<br />
Chauncey Gardiner, 'Being There'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104393</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104393</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104392</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104392</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>funkyfry</strong> — <em>17 years ago(November 08, 2008 02:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">dang, I'd love to see this but it's not on youtube anywhere.<br />
Did I not love him, Cooch?  MY OWN FLESH I DIDN'T LOVE BETTER!!!  But he had to say 'Nooooooooo'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104391</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104391</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lahorikhan2</strong> — <em>20 years ago(August 22, 2005 06:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks for your reply<br />
Dr.Ahmar Hussain Khan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104390</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104390</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>huzdaman</strong> — <em>20 years ago(August 19, 2005 07:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jim is actually in a movie called "Undercover Brother".  In it he plays himself, right down to the yellow karate uniform he wore in "Enter The Dragon".  He's only in it for a minute or two, but its a pretty funny cameo if you're into spy spoof movies</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104389</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104389</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SpeedRacer2K</strong> — <em>20 years ago(July 21, 2005 12:33 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That would be damn sweet if he was in the Tekken film, even for a cameo.<br />
Looks like you forgot to take your anti-retard pills again.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104388</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104388</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lil_g64</strong> — <em>20 years ago(July 05, 2005 05:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">jim needs a new big film to bring him back he should be cast in the new tekken film or mortal kombat or dead or alive. he is a grat fighter and still looks good<br />
LONG LIVE JIM KELLY</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104387</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104387</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SpeedRacer2K</strong> — <em>20 years ago(June 01, 2005 10:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">According to an interview from last year on AICN, he still gets offers to make films. He gets around 3 or 4 a year, but he turns almost all of them down because the films make fun of the movies he used to make, which he's very proud of.<br />
Looks like you forgot to take your anti-retard pills again.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104386</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104386</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>VampireFury</strong> — <em>21 years ago(March 20, 2005 12:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">now a days he's creating his own style of martial arts mixing boxing with karate and something else i can't remember. he wants to open another karate school in texas. man i want to go there so badly.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>john_murdoch2002</strong> — <em>21 years ago(March 01, 2005 12:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I HAVENT SEEN IT EITHER BUT HE WAS VERY GOOD IN "ENTER" &amp; "THREE THE HARD WAY"<br />
HE'S ORIGINALLY FROM PARIS, KENTUCKY, NOT FAR FROM MYSELF.<br />
I HOPE HE DOES MORE FILMS</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104384</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104384</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lahorikhan2</strong> — <em>21 years ago(December 07, 2004 12:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have not seen the commercial what Jim is doing now a days and where he is. Any body can tell me that?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104383</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104383</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>thaiboxer</strong> — <em>21 years ago(November 08, 2004 03:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Samual L Jackson has nothin on Jim the original Bad Mother F@$cker!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tecktrader</strong> — <em>21 years ago(November 03, 2004 09:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Saw the commercial, Jim is still one bad mofo.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Jim&#x27;s Back! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104380</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1104380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:51:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>