<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What will think of The Hateful 8 and also 70 mm?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Mark Kermode</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>boogles</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 07, 2016 09:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's coming - and I wonder what he'll think of it.  He has a love/hate relationship with QT - plus, we know how much he loves film - and hates digital projection.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/123457/what-will-think-of-the-hateful-8-and-also-70-mm</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:24:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/123457.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:10:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What will think of The Hateful 8 and also 70 mm? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:10:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>boogles</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 08, 2016 01:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hmmm, mixed review from him.  Again - he has a love/hate relationship with QT.  He did however, make it "his film of the week".  He didn't comment much on the 70 mm - although, he did say that it made the cinematography look spectacular - even in the interior scenes.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1105330</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1105330</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:10:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>