<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It&#x27;s hard to take any film critic who says Walking with Dinosaurs 3D is worth watching and then says Dracula untold is b]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Mark Kermode</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SinisterCreep</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 03, 2014 11:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's hard to take any film critic who says Walking with Dinosaurs 3D is worth watching and then says Dracula untold is boring and Twilight is better.<br />
for a start Walking with dinosaurs 3D was a terrible,awful bastardisation of a great BBC series complete with an insipid awful voiceover aimed at the lowest common denomenator and kids.<br />
he also dismisses Dracula Untold as being dull and Twilight does it better [also admitting he's a Twilight fan].<br />
well even if Dracula Untold is bad i'd still rather watch it than any of that dumbed down teenage girl Twilight crap and I bet most other critics would too.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/123480/it-s-hard-to-take-any-film-critic-who-says-walking-with-dinosaurs-3d-is-worth-watching-and-then-says-dracula-untold-is-b</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 06:53:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/123480.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 01:14:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>