<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[OHMSS was a great Bond movie but Lazenby was not a great Bond]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — George Lazenby</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>android_movie</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 27, 2016 03:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think people who kept saying Lazenby was the best Bond and therefore a great actor were mistaken.  You need to separate the actor from the movie.  OHMSS was a great Bond movie, but Lazenby was not a great Bond.  How could he?  He didn't have the acting experiences, he didn't have the screen presence needed to play Bond.  In fact, he was really awful playing Bond<br />
If you look at later movies Lazenby starred in, you could really see his limitation as an actor.  Compared to Sean Connery, who actually got nominated and won an Oscar for his role in Untouchable.  So clearly, Connery was a much better actor than Lazenby.<br />
Show me the holes!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/125338/ohmss-was-a-great-bond-movie-but-lazenby-was-not-a-great-bond</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 13:32:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/125338.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:36:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OHMSS was a great Bond movie but Lazenby was not a great Bond on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:36:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1118585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1118585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 05:36:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>