<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Very interesting, to the point of being puzzling…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Phyllis Logan</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>BlueGreen</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 20, 2006 03:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I mean her appearance. Though I don't think most people would necessarily describe her as a "classic" beauty, I've seen her look GORGEOUS (in "Secrets and Lies", for example, and also in "Lovejoy") - and then I saw her playing an elderly-acting matron in "Sad Cypress".<br />
I don't think it has a lot to do with age. It must be something "chamaeleonic" in her. Be it as it may, she has one of those faces that you just <em>have</em> to keep looking at. And those eyes!<br />
Anyway, all her roles are a delight to watch. And she is the one who makes them watchable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/125993/very-interesting-to-the-point-of-being-puzzling</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:38:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/125993.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:18 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Very interesting, to the point of being puzzling… on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121841</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121841</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Very interesting, to the point of being puzzling… on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Backlot_Manager</strong> — <em>17 years ago(May 04, 2008 02:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She's extremely watchable. A really fine actress, and if I'm ever surfing channels, I'll always stop and watch if I see her. The first thing I ever saw Logan in was the Inspector Morse episode "The Daughters of Cain", and she turned in a fine performance. Everything I've seen her in since has been a treat.<br />
As was said, not a "classic" beauty, but I've always been partial to the pale redhead type. She's still looking just peachy, really something of a MILF, if you'll pardon the acronym. The more you watch her, the better she looks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Very interesting, to the point of being puzzling… on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>purplegirl-3</strong> — <em>19 years ago(September 08, 2006 07:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She is a very good actress.I thought she was good in Lovejoy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121839</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121839</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Very interesting, to the point of being puzzling… on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121838</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1121838</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 06:41:20 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>