<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[For a guy who didn&#x27;t start out as an actor, Mazurki was surprisingly good. I was watching him in CHEYENNE AUTUMN today,]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Mike Mazurki</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>xredgarnetx</strong> — <em>18 years ago(June 02, 2007 01:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">For a guy who didn't start out as an actor, Mazurki was surprisingly good. I was watching him in CHEYENNE AUTUMN today, in which he plays a small role. But put him center stage, as some of the best 1940s and 1950s comedies did, some of them Abbott and Costello and Hope and Crosby flicks, as I recall, and he shines as a tough guy or strong man with a very small brain, a sort of latter-day Lon Chaney Jr. He could also be quite menacing, and here I am thinking of a particularly violent Dick Tracy flick where Mazurki stabs and throws one of his victims through a window or skylight.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/127398/for-a-guy-who-didn-t-start-out-as-an-actor-mazurki-was-surprisingly-good-i-was-watching-him-in-cheyenne-autumn-today</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 14:13:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/127398.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 09:40:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>