<![CDATA[Why is he considered a 'Master of Horror'?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — John McNaughton

plutonick-3 — 20 years ago(March 06, 2006 02:11 AM)

Is it because of Henry?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/127821/why-is-he-considered-a-master-of-horrorRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 12:35:03 GMTSat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:23 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why is he considered a 'Master of Horror'? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:28 GMT]]>osa1011 — 19 years ago(December 05, 2006 09:50 PM)

Yea, I was considering it a reach to call him a "Masters of Horror." His episode was originally going to be directed by George Romero, so perhaps he was eager to do it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132876https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132876Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why is he considered a 'Master of Horror'? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:27 GMT]]>stagebandman — 17 years ago(November 07, 2008 09:28 PM)

Go, immediately, and rent "The Borrower". Not only a very good horror movie, but it's got Antonio "Huggy Bear" Fargas! Creepy and funny, I always thought it was pretty overlooked.
The Christian Left - there's more of us than you think.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132875https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132875Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why is he considered a 'Master of Horror'? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:26 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132874https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132874Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why is he considered a 'Master of Horror'? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:25 GMT]]>baronbloody — 20 years ago(March 24, 2006 07:34 PM)

Yes,Henry was an excelent horror movie but i dont think he deserves the title 'Master Of Horror' just for one good horror film.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132873https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1132873Sat, 18 Apr 2026 10:24:25 GMT