<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Disrupt Trump Inaug…..because of the National Popular Vote!!!!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Michael Moore</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>herbsuperb</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 07, 2016 04:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Are you ****ing kidding me you loon?!? This man is the most disgusting propagandist I've ever known of. Just an awful, dishonest piece of trash. Why you ask? I'll tell you.<br />
Disrupt the Inauguration. The Majority have spoken - by nearly 2.7 million votes &amp;counting! Silence is not an option<br />
His CHIEF argument in calling for this "protest" at Trump's rightfully won inauguration event, is that Clinton won the national popular vote (NPV), in an electoral college (EC) election. YOU ****ING MORON!!! The NPV is a mildly interesting consolation prize at the VERY best. To anybody with even a modicum of intelligence and honesty, it means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! If this is the best argument this vile slug has, then he's a complete dunce.<br />
There are two chief reasons the NPV means absolutely nothing in the United States.<br />
#1: It doesn't affect the outcome. At all. This is very obvious, and everybody knows it. Let's move on to #2, which requires a bit of deeper thought, but not much. So please stick with me here.<br />
#2: There is absolutely NO WAY IN **** that ANYBODY can know who would have won the NPV, and the election, if the NPV were the standard of victory. Just because Hillary won the NPV in this past election, does not mean she would have won the Presidency if NPV were the standard of victory!! The ENTIRE campaign, the ENTIRE electoral process, and for Christ's Sake our ENTIRE ****ING HISTORY would have been completely different under an NPV electoral system.<br />
The campaigns would have focused on a completely different set of states, and voters (the states wouldn't mean jack ****, which is why the EC exists in the first place, one of many reasons). People would have voted in different numbers, in different states, and quite possibly, because of the differences in the campaigning that would take place under an NPV system, for different candidates. One couldn't even know if Trump and Clinton would even be RUNNING in this election if we'd been under an NPV electoral process through any portion of our 240 year history. The candidates might be different.<br />
The point is, because the ENTIRE process would be completely different if the NPV were the goal, and because you can't run the entire election cycle under both conditions, there is NO ****ING WAY to conclude from the NPV result in an EC election, what the NPV result would have been in an NPV election where it would actually matter. Anybody who thinks they can is a complete *<em><strong>ing idiot, or a complete arrogant charlatan with no regard for the truth. Michael "</strong></em>-hat" Moore is probably both.<br />
The worst part of it is, I think Michael Moore KNOWS all this. He knows the NPV result means absolutely nothing. But he USES it to con really, really dumb people into doing his bidding for him. He's a rank propagandist who cares NOTHING for how dishonest his methods are, as long as it brings him some kind of result. A complete <strong><strong>ing SCHMUCK!!! The lowest scum there is.<br />
Kiddies. Don't believe a WORD this piece of arrogant **** tells you. That tweet I posted says it all. There is no honesty to be found in this slug. The NPV is a completely meaningless statistic under our electoral system, and Moore knows that. You should too. It doesn't matter if Clinton wins the NPV by 2 million votes, or 10 million votes. Hillary did not campaign to win the NPV. She (and Trump) campaigned to win the EC, and Hillary failed. That's the end of it. If the race was run under an NPV goal, the campaigns would have tried to reach THAT goal, and Trump may very well have won. There is NO WAY to tell. Moore is using this bull</strong></strong> to trick dumb people into disrupting a very solemn ceremonial event that DONALD TRUMP EARNED!!! He has the right to enjoy it, and if this NPV garbage is Moore's BEST argument for calling this stupid protest, then he's wrong. Plain and simple. He's wrong, he's an ***hole, and there's no honesty in him.<br />
Do the RIGHT thing kids of America. Shun this slimeball in every way you possibly can. Unless you enjoy being a mindless sheep, because that's the ONLY kind of people he can sway with his brand of propaganda garbage.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/128966/disrupt-trump-inaug-because-of-the-national-popular-vote</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 10:05:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/128966.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:26:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Disrupt Trump Inaug…..because of the National Popular Vote!!!! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:26:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>herbsuperb</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 08, 2016 09:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You know what is funny is that Moore keeps saying that the majority voted for Hillary Clinton when they didn't. Hillary received 48% of the vote which is not a majority but a plurality. You have to get over 50% of the vote in order for it to be a majority. You also have to factor in that only 53% of the eligible voters in the US even bothered to vote so she wouldn't have won a majority of the entire country even if she had got over 50% of the vote because not everyone votes. I don't know who is more stupid, Moore or the people who listen to him?<br />
An excellent point. When only half of eligible Americans voted, and less than half voted for Clinton, there is absolutely no way to know who would have won if 100% of eligible Americans (and nobody else, mind) voted.<br />
I <strong><strong>ing HATE people (I try not to hate people very much, but this situation warrants it) who are so arrogant as to state with conviction what they cannot possibly know with certainty (the idea that Hillary Clinton would be President under an NPV election, which is bull</strong></strong>). I exclude matters of religious faith in that statement, of course. Because I am humble enough to admit that I do not, and cannot know with certainty who or what God may truly be. That be a matter of faith, this NPV crap is a matter of reality.<br />
I don't know who is more stupid, Moore or the people who listen to him?<br />
The people that listen to him, I think. But yeah, Moore has proven himself a complete dumb**** many times. But he's FAR worse than an idiot. He's a man of moderate intelligence that KNOWS what he's saying is bull****, but says it anyway to manipulate stupid people. That is so ****ing wrong.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1141863</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1141863</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:26:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Disrupt Trump Inaug…..because of the National Popular Vote!!!! on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:26:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>GayBoi1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 07, 2016 10:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Disrupt the Inauguration. The Majority have spoken - by nearly 2.7 million votes &amp;counting! Silence is not an option<br />
You know what is funny is that Moore keeps saying that the majority voted for Hillary Clinton when they didn't. Hillary received 48% of the vote which is not a majority but a plurality. You have to get over 50% of the vote in order for it to be a majority. You also have to factor in that only 53% of the eligible voters in the US even bothered to vote so she wouldn't have won a majority of the entire country even if she had got over 50% of the vote because not everyone votes. I don't know who is more stupid, Moore or the people who listen to him?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1141862</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1141862</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 13:26:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>