<![CDATA[And got lousy reviews. Has he lost his touch?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Steve Oedekerk

Acropolisnow — 18 years ago(June 25, 2007 03:52 PM)

And got lousy reviews. Has he lost his touch?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/131594/and-got-lousy-reviews-has-he-lost-his-touchRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 20:40:46 GMTSat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:01 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to And got lousy reviews. Has he lost his touch? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:06 GMT]]>Clothes-Off — 18 years ago(October 31, 2007 09:59 AM)

Not in my book. I didn't think I'd like EA, so I waited for it to come out on DVD. I liked it.
In fact, I liked it BETTER than
Bruce Almighty
but of course I would since I thought BA stank.
"Well, for once the rich white man is in control!"
C. M. Burns

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159644https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159644Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to And got lousy reviews. Has he lost his touch? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:05 GMT]]>Acropolisnow — 18 years ago(October 10, 2007 03:01 PM)

The films cost 150 M> to make. It did not make its money back.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159643https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159643Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to And got lousy reviews. Has he lost his touch? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:03 GMT]]>TheLogicalDan — 18 years ago(September 29, 2007 09:53 PM)

getting bad reviews dosn't mean it bombed
im not saying its good but when you say a movie "bombed" you are saying that it didn't make any money at the box office, but this movie did pretty good at the box office.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159642https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159642Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to And got lousy reviews. Has he lost his touch? on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:02 GMT]]>Pianoman1980 — 18 years ago(August 20, 2007 05:44 AM)

I think he never had it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159641https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1159641Sat, 18 Apr 2026 19:47:02 GMT