<![CDATA[Its interesting because rhea was never a beauty, but she seems to haveaged pretty =well. I think she looks pretty awesom]]>

<![CDATA[Its interesting because rhea was never a beauty, but she seems to haveaged pretty =well. I think she looks pretty awesom]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Rhea Perlman

benmasta — 14 years ago(November 05, 2011 08:49 AM)

Its interesting because rhea was never a beauty, but she seems to haveaged pretty =well. I think she looks pretty awesome for 63.
id do her for sure. she was sexi back when i watch matilda a bagillion times

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/133177/its-interesting-because-rhea-was-never-a-beauty-but-she-seems-to-haveaged-pretty-well-i-think-she-looks-pretty-awesomRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 02:32:41 GMTSat, 18 Apr 2026 23:20:17 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Its interesting because rhea was never a beauty, but she seems to haveaged pretty =well. I think she looks pretty awesom on Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:20:19 GMT]]>MandelaEffect — 12 years ago(June 14, 2013 03:56 PM)

she looked old when she was young, so, now she looks the same, in my opinion.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1169216https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1169216Sat, 18 Apr 2026 23:20:19 GMT