<![CDATA[Underrated]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Joe Piscopo

Hal9billion — 20 years ago(November 13, 2005 09:43 PM)

One of the best cast members ever, yet doesn't receive the credit he deserves. Great!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/133581/underratedRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 17:54:50 GMTSun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:48 GMT]]>jwpeel-1 — 18 years ago(September 02, 2007 06:56 PM)

Did you know that before he joined the SNL cast, he only did one impression? And it was Tom Snyder, NOT Frank Sinatra.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172353https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172353Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:46 GMT]]>bongmarrow — 19 years ago(August 31, 2006 06:56 AM)

we dont see enough of joe. he can have his own tv series. i say he revive the 'tony rome' character that sinatra brought out on the big screen. joe would be perfect.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172352https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172352Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:45 GMT]]>BeachPirate1976 — 20 years ago(March 13, 2006 01:06 PM)

It's ahrd to say. I think both actors helped the show extremely. I don't think that the show would have been cancelled without Eddie or Joe, but definitelt would have been hit in the ratings. Both actors are great in their own right. Eddie got popular with his standup & movies, while Joe flourished with his one man shows. His show at UCLA back in '87 is fantastic. While he still does the show a few times a year, nothing like it used to be. Who knows where he'd be if he didn't take a break from films. Not sure if it was primarily from his cancer, or just a regular break. I'd love to see him go after come comedic roles. "Johnny Dangerously" is classic Joe.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172351https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172351Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:44 GMT]]>knawdas — 20 years ago(February 17, 2006 11:09 AM)

But the show was "revived" even before Eddie became well-known. By the end of 1980-1981, he was still just in the background.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172350https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172350Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:43 GMT]]>sofuctup — 20 years ago(December 11, 2005 06:02 PM)

the problem with that statement is that if eddie wasn't on the show, only joe, it would have been cancelled, but if it was joe who never was on SNL, eddie still would have saved it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172349https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172349Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:41 GMT]]>slightlystoopid311 — 18 years ago(July 07, 2007 03:48 PM)

Matthew Lawrence sucks.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172348https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172348Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:40 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172347https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172347Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:39 GMT]]>CorinneN — 20 years ago(November 16, 2005 04:57 PM)

I agree. If it wasn't for him and Eddie Murphy, SNL wouldn't be on the air today.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172346https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1172346Sun, 19 Apr 2026 00:30:39 GMT