<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jason Reitman</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jzappa</strong> — <em>18 years ago(March 30, 2008 07:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Juno's good, but it's grossly overappreciated. Thank You For Smoking was actually more interesting, funnier, and edgier.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/135172/anyone-here-agree-that-thank-you-for-smoking-was-better-than-juno</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 06:24:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/135172.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:58:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>PhoenixPhuck</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 13, 2013 02:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I feel both movies deserve equal credit, but I ever-so-slightly prefer Juno and therefore I guess I'm glad it's the one of the two that's gotten so much critical/commercial love.<br />
Even the most primitive society has an innate respect for the insane.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181600</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181600</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>robertsays2182</strong> — <em>13 years ago(September 04, 2012 11:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thank You For Smoking Is much more intelligent than Juno.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181599</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181599</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181598</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181598</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181597</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181597</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>externaltestaccount</strong> — <em>14 years ago(February 05, 2012 04:31 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agreed, it's his most scathing film he's made (I've not seen Young Adult) and it's all the better for it. He seems to have lost his anger at the world and now just accepts his fate, which both Juno and Up In the Air both feel like they are doing. I hope Young Adult sees him back to form.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181596</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181596</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181595</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181595</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HalifaxOliver</strong> — <em>15 years ago(January 28, 2011 07:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">EVERYTHING is better than juno.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181594</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181594</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rk8984</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 23, 2010 08:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Couldn't agree moreFor me, it's Up In The Air &gt; TYfS &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Juno</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181593</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181593</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SinglePlex</strong> — <em>15 years ago(June 10, 2010 10:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yep. Totally. It was even better than Up In the Air. Smoking hot! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":-)" alt="🙂" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181592</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181592</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>stephen-morton</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 18, 2010 08:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree with the OP.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181591</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181591</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>m-slovak79</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 18, 2010 03:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno?<br />
i would say it's close either way depends on what mood i am in. i think the idea behind 'Thank You For Smoking' is better than 'Juno' but both films where quite good.<br />
i give 2000both films a 8/10. so i guess it mostly boils down to if you buy into the hype or not. in fact, when i first seen the previews on 'Juno' i thought the film looked stupid so i kept putting off seeing it but i eventually got around to seeing it and it turned out MUCH better than i expected it to be.<br />
p.s. Jason Reitman is 3 for 3 now after i seen his recent film 'Up in the Air' which i also gave a 8/10.<br />
also on a side note i think in a way 'Thank You For Smoking' somewhat feels like a film i consider to be a masterpiece which is 'Lord of War' (2005) as the basic ideas behind it are similar but instead of being about Gun Running it's about Cigarettes etc.<br />
My Vote History<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=11026826" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=11026826</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181590</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181590</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>laminex</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 18, 2010 02:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Spot on agree 100%<br />
Laminex!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181589</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181589</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mpt3489</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 18, 2010 02:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">hahaha they just arent even close. thank you for smoking is amazing. juno is good just not nearly in the same stratosphere as thank you for smoking<br />
"This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181588</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181588</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>irishhick89</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 26, 2009 10:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">True, jzappa.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181587</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181587</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FletchGives</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 14, 2009 12:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">absolutely</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181586</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181586</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vinjoro</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 10, 2009 11:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Absolutely! TYFS is a brilliant masterpiece really, Juno was ok and kinda pretentious.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Becklin</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 18, 2009 10:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181584</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181584</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>marshjes</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 25, 2010 04:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm glad that others agree with me! Yay Thank You for Smoking!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181583</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181583</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jamasian_man</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 14, 2009 04:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I enjoyed Thank You For Smoking much more than Juno. Juno had a terrible soundtrack, was pretentious, even though funny at times.<br />
I felt Thank You For Smoking was really good.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181582</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181582</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Funkyzeit</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 04, 2009 10:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree, mainly because I prefer Reitman's script to Diablo Cody's.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181581</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181581</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181580</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181580</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Howlin Wolf</strong> — <em>17 years ago(March 31, 2009 08:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, to all.<br />
It's made from bits of real panther, so you know it's good</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181579</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181579</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>death_wish_creators</strong> — <em>17 years ago(March 07, 2009 03:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Both of these movies are pretty good.I think TYFS is probably a little better,sometimes Juno was annoying.Both are good efforts and I think Reitman's best work is all ahead of him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181578</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181578</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Anyone here agree that Thank You For Smoking was better than Juno? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JimmyZappa</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 05, 2009 03:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't agree that it was "grossly overappreciated", but I did like this movie better than Juno. Juno's still great though.<br />
Stuff like this reminds me of "Movie Poop <a href="http://Shoot.com" rel="nofollow ugc">Shoot.com</a>" from Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181577</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1181577</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 03:59:25 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>