<![CDATA[I assume it was Parkinson's. It became quite apparent from 1967.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Ralph Richardson

Jamal-Nazreddin — 13 years ago(April 01, 2013 05:35 AM)

I assume it was Parkinson's. It became quite apparent from 1967.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/135493/i-assume-it-was-parkinson-s-it-became-quite-apparent-from-1967RSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 22:22:04 GMTSun, 19 Apr 2026 04:46:43 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I assume it was Parkinson's. It became quite apparent from 1967. on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:46:45 GMT]]>persistenceofvision — 10 years ago(July 25, 2015 03:00 AM)

Are you quite sure about this? He carried on working, in movies and plays, right up until the end, and Parkinson's would have been hard to hide onstage. He would have been very debilitated, like Pope John Paul II was.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1183701https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1183701Sun, 19 Apr 2026 04:46:45 GMT