Being a werewolf is very stagmitazing in the wizarding world. And a lot of children and grown ups have found solace and strength in the metaphors she made and the world she created.

she rips off the writing style of CS LEWIS narnia the most. "he had a mustache; it was a mustache of a particular way" paraphrasing of course but
www.thefearmakers.blogspot.com

I thought it was privately educated, middle-class boarding school kids who lap up Harry Potter more than anyone else.
They sell far too well for that to be the case. I doubt even one in ten HP readers went to boarding school.
I agree with the rest of what you say though.

I thought it was privately educated, middle-class boarding school kids who lap up Harry Potter more than anyone else.
You probably meant the Dursleys, who are very similar to Dahl's caricatures, and not the Weasleys. Though I would say they're more like the Wormwoods in Matilda than the Twits.
I don't think her books are overwhelmingly similar to Tolkien. I can think of more that Tolkien borrowed from other authors and works, actually.

The Twits are evil disgusting characters. They are nothing like the lovable Weasleys. And I love Dahl.
Containing influences from many other books does not make her unoriginal.
And Hogwarts is a fantasy. You might be as well complain because most wardrobes don't transport children to Narnia!
Basically, the OP's talking rubbish.

The Weaselys are pure Roald Dahl's The Twits. The rest of Harry Potter's a blend of Jill Murphy's The Worst Witch and aspects of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings.
I do hate what the success of Harry Potter says about modern Britain. The vast majority of children who never went to private school living through a series of fantasy books rather than having real opportunities.

Stick to superficially ripping off Roald Dahl. It's what you do best.
She's nothing like Roald Dahl! Have you ever read either of them? It would seem not.