<![CDATA[Just for the Record]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Dan Schneider

fugazi-grrl — 14 years ago(August 05, 2011 05:23 PM)

For people who are so keen on posting their opinions that Dan Schneider is some kind of freak, or pervert just because he works with young female stars, or befriends them. It should be known that he is a happily married man, married to a very lovely woman named Lisa Lillien.
She hosts her own food-site,
http://www.hungry-girl.com/
. And an animation of Lisa is even shown during the title sequence of iCarly, as Freddie's voice-over is counting down 5, 4, 3, 2. !
Hopefully this will help to put to rest that the man is some kind of morbid pedophile when he is responsible for some of the most appealing television comedy I, or my daughter, have ever sat down to watch.
I feel safe letting my daughter watch iCarly. And I would feel completely safe letting Dan & Lisa spend time around my child. I cannot say the same for a lot of other people in the entertainment field.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/136733/just-for-the-recordRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 15:47:43 GMTSun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:09 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:23 GMT]]>falcon2484 — 9 years ago(April 27, 2016 10:35 AM)

Hopefully this will help to put to rest that the man is some kind of morbid pedophile
You must have been new to the internet when you wrote that.
The Falcon flies

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191852https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191852Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:21 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191851https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191851Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:20 GMT]]>Chris_MacGuffin — 11 years ago(August 25, 2014 06:24 PM)

It's funny this was made before the Jerry Sandusky scandal broke. You know the fact he has a wife doesn't mean he doesn't abuse young stars. Now there's no proof and I'm not going to blindly accuse someone of being a pedophile if they're not, but the fact he has a wife makes no difference.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191850https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191850Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:19 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191849https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191849Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:17 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191848https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191848Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:16 GMT]]>iamcage187 — 12 years ago(January 29, 2014 09:03 PM)

Yes but Dan has worked with dozens of kids. Its just simple math that something even a attempt to get money with a lie would have surfaced in 20+ years.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191847https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191847Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:15 GMT]]>mmmonsterfan — 12 years ago(August 17, 2013 03:23 AM)

You're giving parents too much credit. I'm sure some would be perfectly content with their children being harmed as long as said child keeps making money they probably can't even touch because they're underage.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191846https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191846Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:13 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191845https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191845Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:12 GMT]]>juemad — 11 years ago(August 23, 2014 05:51 PM)

Wow, you're the only one commenting on his looks, post after post.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191844https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191844Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just for the Record on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:11 GMT]]>i
b68
amcage187 — 12 years ago(May 11, 2013 10:34 PM)

I agree 100% with you
This all comes down to his looks IMHO He is a large not so good looking man that works with children. Well you know what, that describes a lot of teachers, clergy, and scout leaders. You let you kids be supervised by them even though pedophila is rampart I'm those feilds.
Also Dan is a rich, successful guy in Hollywood. If he had done what you think there would be a legit story somewhere of someone trying to get money off him, even if they were lying about it, and it was proven a lie there would be evidence of a accusation.
Look at Michael Jackson, dude was beloved and the beep still came out.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191843https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1191843Sun, 19 Apr 2026 07:50:11 GMT