<![CDATA[If Electronic Cigarettes Had Been Available Back In Rod's Day…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Rod Serling

barryfleckmann — 12 years ago(June 18, 2013 06:18 AM)

he'd probably be alive, today. A pity, it really is. A shame
NOTICE TO MITT ROMNEY: A BAD DAY FREELOADING, IS BETTER THAN A GOOD DAY AT WORK.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/137423/if-electronic-cigarettes-had-been-available-back-in-rod-s-dayRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 21:43:21 GMTSun, 19 Apr 2026 09:37:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to If Electronic Cigarettes Had Been Available Back In Rod's Day… on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:37:29 GMT]]>barryfleckmann — 12 years ago(July 15, 2013 06:31 AM)

Thanks! As you might expect, I'm a non-smoker, myself. Since I posted about E-cigs, my spam e-mail has been inundated with ads from electronic cigarettes. I've been "hoisted on my own petard!" All because of Rod Serling!
NOTICE TO MITT ROMNEY: A BAD DAY FREELOADING, IS BETTER THAN A GOOD DAY AT WORK.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1196599https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1196599Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:37:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to If Electronic Cigarettes Had Been Available Back In Rod's Day… on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:37:28 GMT]]>rockmail — 12 years ago(July 15, 2013 12:18 AM)

Sorry but no, genius. E-cigs exist mainly to eliminate second hand smoke, since they generate no smoke. But the vapors that the users inhale still contain nicotine, and as they are discovering now, a nice assortment of carcinogens.
So no escape from bad vices with this new tech.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1196598https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1196598Sun, 19 Apr 2026 09:37:28 GMT