He's paranoid. My friend used to be friendly with him and his fellow cast mates. He's very into conspiracy theories, to the point where he believed him to be suffering with some form mental illness. His Instagram which now I see is set to private was totally cuckoo.

If you don't like what he says on Twitter then simply don't follow him! DUH!
Dammit Carol Sue, where is the vodka?!

You might want to go look a little harder into a more precise definition of truther. The reason for the odd pejorative term, is that it identified people who typically deny the actual rational, most commonly known truth about major events. They don't spend their time and energy doing actual research or analysis, but rather seeking out and attaching to the most conspiratorial constructs. Their main process is to find and adopt narratives that always point to a hidden government conspiracy.
So they are always fitting stories to a PREDETERMINED perspective about a subject or event. This is the exact OPPOSITE of "seeking the truth", which is a process where multiple paths are chosen, and those which are not supported by strong, repeatable analysis are thrown out.
Truthers have one narrative, which they bend their "truth" to fit - therefore deserving no acceptance or validation.

Just to follow this thought: You, on a website devoted to the accumulation of information about a field that involves and rewards people for acting, take issue with a persons ability to portray someone else, essentially reading lines and posing in front of cameras. Just wanted to make sure of your complaint. As to his personal life, I don't know him, but the opinions of my waiter don't impact his/her ability to provide great service, why should an actors opinions be any different?
As to the comment about him being a Truther (actually just recently read that term and it cracks me up to no end that people want to use someone pursuing the truth as a negative name), he has seen facts that lead him to believe something. I give him credit for having at least thought about it. Too many seem to just accept because they were told. His deductions may or may not have weight, but regardless of my deductions, I give him props for at least considering options. And yes, I have heard the arguments that the documentary he narrated as being one-sided and not addressing other possible causes of some theories/deductions. That is how a documentary presenting its argument works.

He is a serious nut job. His whole life is being someone else. If only a decent person had adopted him, maybe he would have grown up with an identity instead of just being mush who can read lines and pose accordingly in front of a camera. Graceland would be good, if not for him.

Apparently, he is a truther, though. And that should negate whatever positive you might have on him.

Well Latin would be gibberish to a person who only spoke Russian lol Actually Daniel is pretty bonafide in his intellectuality. Thats clearly shown by his recent article on Huffington Post and other stuff he's written. His tweets about spirituality, his thoughtful political views (though I happen to part ways with him in some instances), and his musings in general are actually extremely thought provoking. Plus he seems kind and that goes a long way in my book. Yb68ou are obviously smart to but your hating on him like that actually kinda makes you sound like someone who wishes they had a platform like his and a mass of people who actually cared about your opinion. Maybe someday you will. I do hope he smokes copious amounts of herb though haha that would make him even cooler, take care dude