<![CDATA[Not that good of an actress.]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Naomi Watts

Confection_Pictures — 9 years ago(November 12, 2016 05:46 PM)

Some great performances doesn't overshadow a career of very mediocre ones and horrid film choices (seriously, Movie 43?).
Want three steaks? My mistake. Four steaks.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/143422/not-that-good-of-an-actressRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 20:53:05 GMTSun, 19 Apr 2026 23:08:18 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Not that good of an actress. on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:08:21 GMT]]>axlrhodes — 9 years ago(November 24, 2016 01:42 PM)

I disagree. Watts has a good deal of emotional range, she's just in a cycle of mediocre projects. She's starring in a new Netflix-produced series coming out in 2017 called Gypsy. I think that'll be a better barometer for where she is as an actress.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1233318https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1233318Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:08:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Not that good of an actress. on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:08:19 GMT]]>FirstBlood1982 — 9 years ago(November 15, 2016 05:59 PM)

She's great in pretty much everything, including the films she's in that I don't really like.
Being in a (fairly amusing) sketch comedy segment in a raunchy comedy doesn't take away from a career full of powerful, emotionally charged performances.
Her current Shut In film isn't all that good, but she's very good in it.
+++by His wounds we are healed. - Isaiah 53:5+++

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1233317https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1233317Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:08:19 GMT