<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Because she&#x27;s old?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jacki Weaver</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>tommylawson2</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 27, 2014 01:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because she's old?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/143502/because-she-s-old</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 07:04:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/143502.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:17:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Because she&#x27;s old? on Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:17:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>thecherrypop</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 16, 2015 01:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Nope, she's done perhaps some of the best work of her career in recent years.<br />
But granted, she's deserved an Oscar for a long time</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1233741</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1233741</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 23:17:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>