I'm pretty sure Jacki Weaver isn't a member of SAG. So I don't think snubbed is the case since she didn't qualify to even be nominated. She should win the Oscar, though.

I'm not sure how the SAGS work but I guess that makes sense? I don't think Jacki has done ANY American film work in her career.goo

Don't you have to have worked in the USA to be eligible?

I wouldnt worry too much bout not getting nominated next year . The Academy Awards do tend to correct the SAG,s mistakes but nominating those they had left out. She has won a few awards already and is getting nominated pretty much in every critics awards and getting a Golden Globe nom does help too. I do feel she will get nominated but winning, i doubt that will happen being an unknown and especially being a non american will come into effect. Just have to hope thatthere are some voters in the Academy that will vote for the performance and not cause of popularity or what country there from. I havent seen any of the favoured nominees likely to get nominated so can`t say if Jacki,s performance is better than all the rest. Melissa Leo,s performance in The Fighter is apparently similar to Jacki,s i reckon voters would sway more to her probably cause she is more known to voters and cause she,s american.

I think you're forgetting the fact that the SAG doesn't take as well to category fraud. Jennifer Connelly was actually nominated for lead by the SAGs and lost up against Halle Berry before being "corrected" by the Oscars. (And really, even though she was the lead actress, she w2000as arguably a supporting actor to Russell Crowe he was the sole lead for most of the film. She most certainly did NOT have as much screen time as he did.)
So does Jacki Weaver still get in? Am I the only one skeptical Mila Kunis will get a nod?

I've never had much time for the SAGs to be honest, and the Connelly-type shenanigans are the reason. It is the actors' union mutual backslapping fest, so I take their "objectivity" with a grain of salt
I just want sausages and mash and a bit of cake. Not twigs fried in honey or a donkey in a coffin!

I think they pulled this maneuver a few years ago when Jennifer Connelly was put in the "Supporting Actress" category for A Beautiful Mind when she had just as much screen time as Russell Crowe. But for her to compete in the leading actress category was too much competition, so they put her against the likes of Helen Mirren and Maggie Smith from Gosford Park.
What shocks me more is that the industry buys it and they voted her for the win. I mean, as an actor, wouldn't you be annoyed by the campaign shenanigans and category hogging by film studios that you would just vote for someone who deserved to win for that category? How Jennifer Connelly won is beyond me. It should have gone to Helen Mirren that year who truly was part of a supporting cast.

Agree. This is definitely a blow. She still has a chance of getting in but her chances of winning are now obviously a long shot.
Putting Hailee Steinfield in as a supporting actress is, by all reports, category fraud. Perhaps the Oscars will play fair.

Blame this on lack of publicity on Jacki's part. Her US reps have been repeatedly asking her to help promote the film in the US but she seemed to be too busy in Sydney with Cate Blanchett.