<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why was his act OK but Paul Reubens was blacklisted?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Fred Willard</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Theodor_Birch</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 24, 2016 11:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I know Reubens is a much more seedy characters - sans supposed quasi-kiddie porn controversy* - but Reubens became a national joke were as Willards event seems permanently resided in "not-so-fun facts" on a trivia website<br />
I have no problem with men performing acts of this nature in theatre of this nature - especially since A that's what they're there for, and second since it's basically entrapment since apparently police officers spy on the audience waiting to catch oe, but I can't fathom the difference<br />
Sure, I would be more inclined to let it slide with Willard than with Reubens, but that's not how the system should work.<br />
*And it wasnt even that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/144231/why-was-his-act-ok-but-paul-reubens-was-blacklisted</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 01:26:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/144231.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why was his act OK but Paul Reubens was blacklisted? on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>laneytalks</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 04, 2017 06:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think it was because he was 73 and they were just impressed he cou5b4ld still do a lewd act.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238759</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238759</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why was his act OK but Paul Reubens was blacklisted? on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jeffreyashcraft</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 23, 2016 12:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">FEL123_2000 replied Aug 24, 2016<br />
I'll bet it was because Paul was known for having a child audience and appeal, which made it all the more shocking to people.<br />
Pee Weeks Playhouse had a predominately adult audience</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238758</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238758</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why was his act OK but Paul Reubens was blacklisted? on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bradbasham</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 26, 2016 08:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd have never thought these places even existed anymore, what with the Internet, and all.<br />
Maybe it's for the homeless people to have, to rub one out.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238757</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238757</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why was his act OK but Paul Reubens was blacklisted? on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FEL123_2000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 24, 2016 09:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'll bet it was because Paul was known for having a child audience and appeal, which made it all the more shocking to people.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1238756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 01:10:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>