<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Regarding the &#x27;Gross Indecency&#x27; Charges]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Peter Wyngarde</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>PixieInChains</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 04, 2016 06:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Didn't John Gielgud have those same types of charges?  It certainly didn't affect him any.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/145330/regarding-the-gross-indecency-charges</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:25:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/145330.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:54:10 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Regarding the &#x27;Gross Indecency&#x27; Charges on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:54:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MuMu2525</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 31, 2016 03:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">John Gielgud never really had a "ladies man" image though, unlike super cool Jason King.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1245840</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1245840</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 03:54:11 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>