<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Amanda Seyfried</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ArchersGoonGirl</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 25, 2015 03:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think she tends to be more suited to comedy, even though she was excellent as Linda Lovelace. Unfortunately, comedic actresses often get overlooked when compared to those that do more drama. Amanda also seems to still be playing ingenue roles, which is more usual for actresses five years younger. Her career is fine, she attaches herself to decent projects, but their success isn't often attributed to her involvement.<br />
GoonGirl for Hire</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/148291/it-will-be-a-long-time-before-she-is-taken-seriously-as-an-actress</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:28:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/148291.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:45 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>chrisamon</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 26, 2016 11:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"She has never done gratuitous nudity!"<br />
"She needs a nude love scene. I want a peep."<br />
Oh. Then where'd the pics and vids come from?<br />
Sometimes ya gotta wonder.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267498</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267498</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mgreen9715</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 07, 2015 10:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She needs a nude love scene. I want a peep.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267497</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NeedysBoy</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 23, 2015 01:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No.<br />
She has never done gratuitous nudity!<br />
"Maybe it's another dimension.  Or, you know, just really deep."  Needy</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dodrade</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 21, 2015 05:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wonder if her willingness to do nude scenes might also work against her being taken as seriously as her contemporaries.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267495</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267495</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lostsok0523-654-279444</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 12, 2015 04:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I find this thread odd, as I would certainly take her seriously as an actress.  She hasn't really had a defining role yet, but the sad honest truth is that Hollywood seems to make fewer of those roles for women, and turn to whatever the current A-list is to fill them.<br />
I would strongly suspect Seyfried will have a very long and varied career.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267494</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267494</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bluedionysus</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 17, 2016 01:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yep. Her career has certainly been a mixed bag in terms of subject matter, quality, and level of production. In any case: I couldn't agree more - it's only up from here for Amanda.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267493</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267493</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Wilde_child</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 06, 2015 03:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes plus she's very versatile (she can do musicals, thrillers, horror films, fantasy, musicals) and makes right choices, so Amanda has got a bright future ahead of her. Luv this lady.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267492</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267492</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ArchersGoonGirl</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 20, 2015 12:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well Amanda still looks like she's in her early 20s, which may be why she's often cast younger.<br />
GoonGirl for Hire</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267491</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267491</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It will be a long time before she is taken seriously as an actress on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>choke_on_that</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 11, 2015 12:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Eh, actresses are playing ingenue roles well into their 30's today. Regardless of how ageist Hollywood, the modern actress can still have an ingenue/starlet image at 29/30. Actually, Hollywood (and even modern society) encourages putting maturity off much longer these days, and I think that is part of the reason Amanda might be struggling to transition. I think she has shown dramatic chops, but it is trickier to transition into mature roles nowadays, even for male actors her age.<br />
There are few things as fetching as a bruised ego on a beautiful angel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267490</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1267490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:27:47 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>