And now she is plenty old enough (seems like she's 20, I cant even remember anymore) to do any nudity she wants and STILL is not doing any, so obviously these posts were wrong that she would go wild. But yeah it's funny they said miley was topless abck when she had something covering her. (obviously now miley is wild though, but at the time they were misusing the word topless).
Everyone should wish she does NOW do nudity. Nothing annoys me more than actresses refusing to do it between 18-24, the hot years, then they all decide to do it when their bodies don't look good anymore.

If we can't see nips, she isn't topless. Get that straight, people.
jk90

39 of the last 45 Best Actress Oscar winners have been nude in films.
See how that works?

Too many pervs must have scared her off of showing her big breasts because since she turned 18 she is wearing nothing but none revealing outfits to events. People were probably tweeting her and it freaked it out so she is keeping them covered now.

She's just changing her "product".
If people still see her as childlike she won't land the adult roles she wants.

How is it topless if you can't see the boobs and nipples? Talk about sensationalizion by the media.
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither ~ B. Franklin

I'm not sure if your insulting me or not, but if you are, I'm not American.

What a ridiculous and stupid topic without any premise! Probably, only degenerate Americans are capable of creating something like that.

In my humble opinion, it's not
topless
if you can't see the nipples. Much ado about nothing.

I suppose you could say that any act that brings her to the attention of the public is a scream for attention. Guess I'm not that cynical.

Screams forda0 attention, give me a break, you aren't this naive!
Wasn't me

What does it say?

Not yet an adult, yet can't wait to shed her clothes, says a lot.
Wasn't me

And I imagine many have not wound up with troubled lives. I also suspect that there are plenty of young women who have never done nude work who have troubled lives.

Many young women that has rushed into nude work, they wind up with troubled lives.
Wasn't me

Geez, the things people want to make a big deal about. These are NOT topless photos. She's 17 not 13. She's showing far less skin in these photos than she would in a bikini and nobody would be in an uproar over photos of her on the beach in a swimsuit.

If it is artistic who cares, it's her body.
Carpe DiemOne Day at a Time

What country are you from so we can lump EVERYONE from your country into a small group to bash youbased on a very broad generalization. I am American, see no problem with nudity.or with her showing off her tits. If it's what she wants to do, more power to her. And no offense, but MOST Americans feel the same way.

hey the united states of america is a cesspool of failures

exactlyyay for cut of limbs noooooo for a nice body and some skin haha

Yeah,they are so stupid.They talk about violence,guns and drugs all the time,they even bombed those towers by themselves but when a 17 yo girl poses sexy,hell no.That is too much.

americans.. pfff who effin cares.. we are born naked and because everything gets a little bit bigger its wooooooooooooow.. nooooooooo she show her boobs..

For all of the bull beep that the feminists like to spout, they still rely on selling their bodies and not their talent. Sad.

First
She may or may not have been topless. You really can't tell.
And it is easily pop art, without question.

This message has been deleted.