<![CDATA[Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kelly Osbourne

gp88888 — 14 years ago(January 07, 2012 10:44 PM)

Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/148726/is-she-really-a-size-2-she-definitely-lost-a-lot-of-weight-but-i-don-t-think-a-size-2-is-accurateRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 09:30:20 GMTMon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:37 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:47 GMT]]>omigoddess — 10 years ago(July 26, 2015 04:01 PM)

She is far from a size 2. Maybe a size 6 at her thinnest (size 6 is about average).

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270542https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270542Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:46 GMT]]>dzturbedne — 12 years ago(February 23, 2014 12:45 PM)

She has never looked a size 2. Not even at her thinnest. Maybe a size 6. I wear an 8 and somehow look slimmer than her. I too am short. I'm only 5'4"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270541https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270541Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:44 GMT]]>stayprettystockholm — 14 years ago(January 21, 2012 04:22 PM)

if she's short (and she looks it) she could be. but then again, Kim Kardashian is also short and ALSO claims to be a size too. Maybe on top, but she sure as heck aint on the bottom
http://i44.tinypic.com/x4ozk.jpg

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270540https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270540Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:43 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270539https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270539Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:41 GMT]]>ImMichelle — 14 years ago(January 20, 2012 06:33 AM)

I know the camera adds a lot of weight, but I still don't see how she could be a size 2. I'm a size 4 and she looks a lot bigger than me. She looks great, but when she said she was a size 2 I found it hard to believe.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270538https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270538Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:40 GMT]]>kelly_11140 — 14 years ago(January 16, 2012 03:46 PM)

I don't think either one of them are a 2. I think Hudson is smaller than Osbourne but neither of them is a 2. I would say Hudson is probably about a 6 and Osbourne is an 8. Spandex works wonders.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270537https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270537Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is she really a size 2? She definitely lost a lot of weight but I don't think a size 2 is accurate on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:38 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270536https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270536Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:40:38 GMT