<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Just an observation but it seems she only became relevant again when she lost weight. Before that I don&#x27;t remember seein]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kelly Osbourne</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>imamaniac</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 21, 2015 01:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just an observation but it seems she only became relevant again when she lost weight. Before that I don't remember seeing her in much of anything. Just shows how shallow L.A. is.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/148730/just-an-observation-but-it-seems-she-only-became-relevant-again-when-she-lost-weight-before-that-i-don-t-remember-seein</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 21:36:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/148730.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Just an observation but it seems she only became relevant again when she lost weight. Before that I don&#x27;t remember seein on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270574</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270574</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Just an observation but it seems she only became relevant again when she lost weight. Before that I don&#x27;t remember seein on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Avola</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 09, 2015 09:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh please. It's not just Hollywood that's shallow. You have 2 candidates for a job, both are fully qualified but 1 is hideous while the other is gorgeous. Guess who's getting the job?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270573</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270573</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Just an observation but it seems she only became relevant again when she lost weight. Before that I don&#x27;t remember seein on Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jfd0210</strong> — <em>11 years ago(April 06, 2015 01:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She only gets work because her "mummy" badgers people into giving her a job.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270572</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1270572</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:41:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>