I thought she did a great job. And to her credit, because there were a boatload of different characters she had to handle.

All I'm saying is, she can't read in different characterizations, and make them sound like plausible human beings.
It wasn't the editing or the production or anything else. It was just a poor job of reading the book, and they should have picked someone else.
Nice that you liked it. She might be very good at ad campaigns that don't need dramatazation; but I still think she should stay away from playing characters on audio.
I'm not alone in this regard. check out the reviews on www.audible.com for this audiobook.

I find it strange that you're saying her voice in the audio book sounded "so awful" since I've listened to it many times and liked her voice enough to hire her through my company to have her voice used for our entire advertising campaign. It was been such a success and I have only heard great feedback. I find that you must either have something out for her personally or you're a very pety person. As for the granite comment, all I have to say is: tomato, toma(H)to you apparently understood it.

Gwendolyn Yeo like so many other talented artists is subj1908ected to the editing process (and opinions) of directors, editors and producers. So while we dutifully do our best work, remaining as present, honest and yes, vulnerable as possible in our performances, we often have little or no control over the final product. We show up on set, in the studio or in the booth day after day and do our best work. That's our job. If our best work ends up on the cutting room floor, that's just the way it goes. We accept that. What we find hard to accept is fielding the harsh, hurtful opinions voiced by individuals like ladyofthelake66.
I'd like to believe we all do our best in life and sometimes that is just not enough. I'm sure that ladyofthelake66 was doing her best when she wrote "not produced" rather than "pronounced."
Just my opinionand it's probably worth about two cents, as well.