<![CDATA[I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Omarosa Manigault

carriepookie — 20 years ago(July 10, 2005 09:16 PM)

I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought she could've been my mother!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/153186/i-was-born-in-74-i-would-have-sworn-she-is-in-her-40-s-she-s-not-unattractive-just-does-not-look-only-30-thought-shRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 23:07:10 GMTTue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:55 GMT]]>pvd295 — 10 years ago(February 22, 2016 09:14 PM)

I always thought she was about ten years older than what she is claiming, as well.
I prefer fantasy over reality TV - like Fox News. - B.Streisand

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301803https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301803Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:54 GMT]]>j-curl — 10 years ago(September 10, 2015 10:33 PM)

For some reason, I always remember her birth being listed 1964, not 1974. But I can see from this it's been listed as '74 for at least a decade now.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301802https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301802Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:52 GMT]]>ragreen259 — 19 years ago(November 09, 2006 06:08 PM)

eight years on the streets as a crack whore took it's toll.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301801https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301801Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:51 GMT]]>vababy — 13 years ago(March 24, 2013 10:15 PM)

1968 I can believe but 1974 no way.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301800https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301800Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:49 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301799https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301799Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:48 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301798https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301798Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:46 GMT]]>pleasure-friendly — 19 years ago(June 19, 2006 03:26 PM)

You're all wrong! Her sources state she w2000as born in 1968. She actually lied about her age while she applied for The Apprentice.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301797https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301797Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:45 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301796https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301796Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:44 GMT]]>geng_karen — 20 years ago(February 15, 2006 02:08 PM)

her wrinkles make her look like shes in her late 40s

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301795https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301795Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:42 GMT]]>missunicorn007 — 20 years ago(February 07, 2006 05:31 PM)

she scares me.that's all i have to say!
"Ms Kim, you know my daughter right? tall, pretty, wears Chanelhardly a gangster" - Julie Cooper

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301794https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301794Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:41 GMT]]>ragreen259 — 20 years ago(January 28, 2006 05:36 PM)

Being a crack whore really ages you.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301793https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301793Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:39 GMT]]>aq_23 — 20 years ago(December 20, 2005 12:05 AM)

Gosh all that evil went right to her face. Cause she is not a young looking 31.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301792https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301792Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:37 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301791https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301791Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:36 GMT]]>lisajs31 — 18 years ago(December 04, 2007 07:46 PM)

There is NO way that is a true statement. I attended Central State University in 1985, YES 1985 and graduated in 1990. Missy was HOMECOMING QUEEN 1985, which means THERE is NO way she was born in 1974 and if you were in undergrad with her, NO way you were born in 1975. I think you guys are dropping 10 years from your year of birth. Proof, JET Magazine actually ran a photo of the short hair Home Coming Queen in 1985 at Central State University in Wilberforce, OHIO. Nice try!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301790https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301790Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:34 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301789https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301789Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:33 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301788https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301788Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:31 GMT]]>Mimi5678 — 20 years ago(October 09, 2005 02:21 PM)

Its her face.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301787https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301787Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:30 GMT]]>sharon-17 — 20 years ago(October 04, 2005 12:04 AM)

She seems like she's pushing 50. I'm surprised she isn't that old. Something about her just seems middle-aged.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301786https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301786Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:28 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301785https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301785Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:27 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301784https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301784Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:25 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301783https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301783Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was born in '74, I would have SWORN she is in her 40's. She's not unattractive, just does not look only 30. Thought sh on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:24 GMT]]>stephaniallen731 — 20 years ago(July 11, 2005 08:40 AM)

It's true. We were in undergrad together. I was born in 1975.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301782https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1301782Tue, 21 Apr 2026 02:53:24 GMT