<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[about anything envolving them]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Duane 'Dog' Chapman</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bri-Bri89</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 04:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">about anything envolving them</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/154778/about-anything-envolving-them</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 23:35:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/154778.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>marlenagriffinknott</strong> — <em>15 years ago(January 12, 2011 05:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Tucker's a jackass for selling out his own father to a tabloid everyone says things in the heat of an argument that they regret</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313082</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313082</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>johnnyrocket84</strong> — <em>17 years ago(December 24, 2008 07:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Haha, well said.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313081</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313081</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mettemarithaakon</strong> — <em>17 years ago(July 16, 2008 05:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Focker is a little twerp sitting in a flea infested prison cell being violated up the butt every single day by a guy named Paka at Halawa prison.  The Twerp deserves it.<br />
The ghetto ugly black Medusa girlfriend with a nasty rat's weave is a sleazy con-artist whorebag who supplied Focker drugs.<br />
Both are A-holes.  Lower than pond scum and dog pooh.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313080</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313080</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>blackarachnia2</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 14, 2007 11:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You don't want to know what I think of Tucker and Monique.  I would be  afraid of overloading the profanity filters.<br />
"Tombstones don't talk back."<br />
Leland Blaine Chapman 07/07/04</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313079</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313079</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Leveticus</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 10, 2007 06:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Tucker is a scumbag for selling his own father out like that for just for money. He should be ashamed of himself for doing that. He's responsible for tearing the Chapman family apart and I hope Dog disowns him. If my kid did that to me, I would never forgive him and cut all my ties with him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313078</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313078</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ilvrockroll</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 10, 2007 07:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">isn't tucker the one who just got out of jail?<br />
trolls beware, I use the ignore button so don't bother!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313077</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313077</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Bri-Bri89</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 04:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">bloodybirthday divorced who im confused is that sarcasim</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313076</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313076</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>queen-smartass</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 04:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hahahaa ten second man, eh? I woulda NEVER guessed <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";)" alt="😉" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313075</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313075</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BloodyBirthday</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 04:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why do you think I divorced his nasty ass? Not only is his bed conversations boring but two strokes and it is over!!! I swear I could put on a pot of minute oats and by the time he was done I could eat something. He is a total idiot.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313074</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313074</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>queen-smartass</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 03:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ignore tester. It thinks it's amusing and enjoys posting death threats against Dog and Beth along with whatever bunk it cares to spew all over the place. It will likely be banned soon.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313073</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313073</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BloodyBirthday</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 02:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That did not make any sense. He has a relationship with his children now. He did not have the cash when they were younger, now he does. I am sure he has a will. If  Tucker had walked a strait line he could have had a future cash cow. Now for sure he will not get a damn thing. Your whole sentence was weird what are you drinking?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313072</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313072</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tester22</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 01:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"He would have got more if he stayed in Dogs good graces and waited for the old man to tick off."<br />
Why?  He never supported any of his off-spring when they were growing up and abandoned most of them at birth.  Why would he do any different at his death?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313071</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313071</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Bri-Bri89</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 11, 2007 06:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">im not ur little tex buddy either "it's gud 4 u" yea shut that up  and this damn sure isnt an english  class its a message board if you dnt like it get off of it</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313070</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313070</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ofakam</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 10, 2007 10:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Tucker is a sell out.<br />
Got Bacon?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313069</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313069</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ssmith01</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 10, 2007 06:25 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"tha gurl"?<br />
Honey, we're not your little text message buddies.<br />
Spelling. It's gud 4 u.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313068</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313068</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Bri-Bri89</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 08, 2007 01:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">but 2 stay in dogs good graces he wud of had to give up tha gurl n clearly he didnt want 2 do that</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313067</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313067</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kurious369</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 11:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Pcharles- Good points. I didn't look at it that way. As for pulling a Mills, hell no!! As for compensation, they should have sued Dog, not gone public. Through court it would have come out into the open &amp; there would (?should) be more reliable sources, &amp; possibly less bs on these boards regarding the incident. I agree with you on the majority of what you wrote.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313066</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313066</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mettemarithaakon</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 10:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Oh bull.<br />
The skank was smiling because her arse was paid to give that interview.   More money f111cor her and Tucks since he can't hold a job for more than one month.<br />
New photo of Tucker<br />
<a href="http://th192.photobucket.com/albums/z117/morticia1976/forum%20pics/th_" rel="nofollow ugc">http://th192.photobucket.com/albums/z117/morticia1976/forum pics/th_</a> tuckerdart1.jpg<br />
<a href="http://th192.photobucket.com/albums/z117/morticia1976/forum%20pics/th_tuckerdart1.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://th192.photobucket.com/albums/z117/morticia1976/forum pics/th_tuckerdart1.jpg</a><br />
Tucker high as a kite<br />
<a href="http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m43/loki2thor1/11.jpg" rel="nofollow ugc">http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m43/loki2thor1/11.jpg</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313065</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313065</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pcharles300</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 08:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">well maybe the reason she was smiling is because it happened a while back, not just a second ago. and perhaps another reason is because she is not going to let the ignorant words of another person affect her demeanor. would you prefer she pull a heather mills move and talk about committing suicide because she now has to deal with the media? she knows that she is getting publicity, event though it came about from a dreadful situation. and they did get money for it. this situation is pretty awkward. she should be compensated for having to be the subject of that slur, but then now she has to be in the media. and it is also sad to see dog's career go up in flames at the same time. i think his use of that word wasn't meant to be vindictive as say michael richards lynching reference, or even don imus' idiotic remark. i think those were more racist, whereas dog did clearly explain that he didn't think african americans were inferior or anything like that. i think that saying the n word does not make someone a racist, it also depends on their attitude and how they mean it. for example, don imus didn't use the n word but what he said about those women implied that he thought that all african american women are whores and he used their hair texture in a deragatory way. of course, one should never use that word, but i am just saying that dog's use of it didn't seem as severe as michael richard talking about lynching people.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313064</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313064</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kurious369</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 07:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Did you see Monique in the Nat'l Enquirer interview? The excerpts I saw on Hannity &amp; Colmes &amp; Larry King, she was SMILING!!! If she was that offended &amp; upset then why was she smiling. Why wasn't Tucker in that interview (anyone know?)? So, again, it's about the money. Dog saw the exerpts &amp; he apologized to them both, stated Monique was pretty &amp; that after all of this Tucker better marry Monique!  It also sounds like Tucker is having a hard time keeping a job (per the interview w/Dog) &amp; needs the money.  Larry King replay 11/08 12:00 midnight est, 11:00cst.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313063</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313063</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BloodyBirthday</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 06:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">He would have got more if he stayed in Dogs good graces and waited for the old man to tick off.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313062</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313062</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313061</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313061</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to about anything envolving them on Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BloodyBirthday</strong> — <em>18 years ago(November 07, 2007 06:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think they are selfish in a way because they did not stop and think about everyone involved. Their game plan had holes and the thoughts of money clouded their reason. This just did not affect Dog and Dog only. All of the family, the young children, and spouses involved will face scrutiny by the community. The children will be teased. Family members might lose jobs. I am sure going to the supermarket and other places for the spouses will not be a peaceful thing.<br />
There is something here that the public does not know about. It is a soap opera in which I am sure Dog is not the only villain. They sat on this tape for eight months. I hardly think that Tucker and his woman are innocent victims.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313060</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1313060</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:43:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>