This message has been deleted.

I agree

I think it's fair to assume you are on medication for some sort of mania. Apt name, I suppose.
Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever conceived.
-Isaac Asimov

A brilliant book. But my wife's no Vera - she doesn't play chess.

which we both thought was absolutely brilliant
Why do I get the feeling that you love Vladimir Nabokov's
Lolita
?

HA. Actually, my wife is also a big Mia fan, ever since "Jane Eyre", which we both thought was absolutely brilliant (she's not jealous, at all). Last night we watched the "Crimson Peak" blu-ray together - and LOVED it.
I suppose I should be grateful that you've made the effort to research and "analyze" me, and free of charge at that - not that I think THAT'S creepy. I also have a degree in psychology, by the way (actually not kidding), but I find I have enough to handle with looking at myself these days - trying to figure out how other people should live and what they should do with their time, is something I now stay away from - ESPECIALLY on the internet, LOL. But you know passion is a word that describes strong feelings - it can be positive or negative, it works both ways.
My wife also loves "Tracks" - such a beautiful and poetic film - and a great performance from M.W.

I feel pity for your wife and your fami5b4ly then that you spend your whole day commenting on the social media about her, instead of spending time with them How doesn't she get jealous?
You really don't sound like a mature man, or rather a father of a family, at all, and this shouldn't be read as an insult, by no means, just a remark that you maybe want to know!
Calling my trenchant critcisim about her a "passion"well, it's probably not that strong, but I better don't elaborate on that, however, it makes me upset to watch those movies that I'm interested in and she doesn't do well in them, as I've a very strict notion in regard to what a good actor should master - showing different emotions with facial expressions and their voice, accents and vividness.
Anyways, thank you for being so open about your personal life, I didn't want to be intimidating, but I really got creepy feelings about your behavior here, especially when I'd read your comment about Mia's surname, that you thought of it as poetic
I must say that you give me quite a turn!
My life equally consists of literature, art, theater and movies. The reason why I analyze human beings in regard to speeches, appearances and writing style(as I did with you) is that I studied psychology, before I'd studied English literatu111cre and now work as a lecturer of English studies. The human psychology is an interesting thing, as one's foibles can determine inspirations for what one craves.
Have a good day!

First of all. Gothic_Maniac, I'm not 23 - far from it (LOL). Since you seem to be investigating me personally (something I avoid doing with others) you might want to know (I probably shouldn't go there, but I will) - I have two sons that share accounts with me, both in their 20's. If I'm guilty of immaturity, as you say, it can't be blamed on my chronological years. You're point about me sounding like an attorney may have some validity - it's something my wife has leveled at me when we're arguing a point, although we seldom are disrespectful of each other (personal again), but we've achieved that over a long marriage. As opposed to being an actual attorney, however, I'm a musician and lover of the arts. You seem to also have a passion for Mia, but of a negative nature. I would say that Mia has become a real muse for me, a source of inspiration, through her talent, her integrity, and the quality of her films - I feel she's unique and embodies truth and beauty, which are what I find most inspirational in life, and also in art.

I never would say to anyone that they can't write their reply or comment under mine, or anyone else's, negative or positive - if I ever did, I was wrong.
You already did today in regard to jjparish by trying to attack him on the Crimson Peak board, so where is here the freedom of speech? As you are already familiar with, ImdB is a movie board, where people discuss acting skills, movies and their depths, so why do you always take the position of being Mia's lawyer, when people are expressing their opinions considering her "acting"?
Another behavior I totally think of immature is the immediate reaction to negative sensations that it is led by jealousy or worse, having another actor/actress in mind that could be seen as a competitor for her. This is exactly the moment when a discussion, or rather an argument loses its reliability and validity, because the person who discusses is not able anymore to find any arguments against the thesis of the other, so reproaches the other person with jealousy or sth similar. It is at first important to realize that there can be more reasons for someone's opinion, as I try to underline, not to be pigeonholed!
Apart from that, as I've already stated in my first post here, I really think that you should be aware for the future that not every praise or compliment is really meant, because you have to contemplate, whether this particular person normally compliments everyone, or is it an exception? As much as there are people out there who like to compliment to give the impression of being polite and nice, like "Hey, you look ravishing today" (That's a sentence by Hiddleston who loves to use it when he runs across sb), there are also people, like co-stars who do the same by praising acting skills or appearances to come out as a gentle person, especially in that moment when the other one, who is being complimented does usually get low criticism or no attention at all. I think I can give you that example: You are bad at math at school, but you are not a troublemaker. You are a calm lad who doesn't do naughty things, so your math teacher wants you to improve and become better, as he/she is also aware of you being an introvert and not having much friends. It is a kind of compassionate reaction. He/she often comes to you and praises very little correctly calculation methods. In this connection, the wrong assumption of that person would be to feel superior to the other ones in class who are all actually better in math and that actually, he isn't able to understand the intention of the special care by the teacher. That's how I consider the situation with Mia.
As I can recall from your youtube account, your age must be 23,so you are in a young, but productive age that shouldn't be conducted by a narrow-minded perception of human thoughts and speeches, as there could always be a variety of other things meant by assertions.
Moreover, I really think that you should consider your own life to be precious enough not to be targeted at playing Mia's lawyer on the internet, as you seem to spend your whole day thinking about her and commenting everywhere on the social media about her, as there is a difference between passion and obsession.

Amen brother. What astounds me is how she gets so much work when she is so dreadful an actress?
You went out of your way to post this spiel on two different threads.
I don't care if you're not a fan yet it sounds like you've got some issues.
You four-eyed psycho.

I'm sure we agree on somethings Gothic_Maniac, but obviously not re the subject of this thread. I have no idea what you pursue anywhere else, but you probably vent your passions and interests (hopefully, you enjoy yourself). I never would say to anyone that they can't write their reply or comment under mine, or anyone else's, negative or positive - if I ever did, I was wrong. This thread, or any thread, is open to people agreeing or disagreeing - at least that's how I see it - it's the nature of Imdb. If I say something positive and glowing somewhere, people are free to come along and question what I say, or mock it, whether I like it or not. I also got a go1c84od laugh out of Fake_Plastic_Love's comment - a sense of humor is always appreciated. We may start threads, but we don't own them, and we can't control what people say.

Actually, it was not my intention5b4 to come back to this thread and answer to funny, yet self-absorbing comments, but
I still can't believe that my point on the minority who likes Mia W. has been proved, which means that those people are not able to read and accept different opinions and get aggressive: Do you consider yourself as her agent or the administrator of this board? Why are ALWAYS the same people replying and discussing things all over again here? Do you realize that it is effing creepy what you do?
What does my first sentence on this thread say, are you illiterate?
I don't need to read any positive answers about her under MY thread, so just spare your opinion and go to another thread! Thank you.
I could easily write on your other threads about MY OPINION about her which is not based on a personal dislike, but on a long study of her movies, interviews and her appearance in her private life that results in my perception of her being untalented, monotonous and bland. If you can't accept this thread, then I have to assure you that you will find my comments under every post of yours in future, as you do regularly to try changing the opinion of others. I'm not like you, as I don't terrorize other people's perceptions, while staying on my thread. That's how mature people do.
And Joel I think the best answer you ever got is surely by Fake_Plastic_Love in this thread of yours:
http://www.imdb.com/board/11682180/board/thread/228106944?d=228106944#228106944
I think it is time that you begin a healthy life, without commenting or opening new threads on the internet, as twitter and facebook, because it IS creepy, believe me. If Mia had read the posts you are writing here, she would probably quit acting (maybe she should).
Another point I want to amplify is that people (on a psychological perspective) tend to feel closer to those who are similar to them, means in regard to Mia being introvert, incapable of understanding questions immediately and responding to them with depths, being antisocial etc.. what I've read a few times about her on youtube was: "She is just shy, I can totaly relate to that". This is actually not an objective perspective, as one could argue, whether this approach would appear similarly, if this person was not an introvert. Subjective perspectives, therefore, can't be taken seriously in regard to someone's talents.
To sum up, I can say that you and your, equally creepy followers, don't have to show up evertime someone wants to express an opinion, it is those very different opinions and perceptions that color the lifeless souls of people, and you are not her lawyer! If someone still writes under this thread, it will just show their lack of intelligence not being able to understand my firb68st statement about having the opportunity to write in under threads here to express their opinion, where I won't disturb them. However, if this goes on here, I will. For sure.

This message has been deleted.

I liked her statement about herself in the Charlie Rose interview along with Jessica C. and Tom H.
She called herself a "low-brow", since she didn't study anything that has to do with drama, which is obvious from her lack versatility
and in another interview again with them both she said that
she got to work with all those directors, because other actresses were not available!
LOL.. that sums up her whole career.

Amen brother. What astounds me is how she gets so much work when she is so dreadful an actress? It surely cant be all down to the unavailability of quality actors. I mean its obvious how average actresses like rumer willis or emma roberts get work. Just look at their last names. But how does a wasikowski get so MUCH work?

Well I really like herthe majority of people on here need to get out more.

'Pretentious' is a vacuous criticism that says nothing about the artwork and everything about the critic. It's being dismissive without putting in any effort.
But Only Lovers Left Alive was hilarious - I guess the humour went right over your head. It was in part actually making
fun
of such people.

Why? Have you seen that film? It was just two skinny people lying around, looking oh so cool, name dropping. Only improved when Mia appeared.

The moment someone calls a film pretentious is the moment I realise their opinions are worthless.

I have a hunch that in "Only Lovers Left Alive" we got a taste of the "real" Mia. I suspected she's annoyed at being typecast as "The Waif."

Absolutely agree. I don't understand the praise she gets. She is wooden. The only film I have liked her in was Only Lovers Left Alive. She was actually good in an otherwise boring, pretentious film.

I love Mia! She is, in my opinion, wasted in period dramas. I think her talents are better suited to modern roles (The Kids Are All Right, The Double, Stoker). It is true that she plays angry/angsty a lot but I think that's a result of typecasting. She was very dynamic in her role on In Treatment. The character she played, Sophie, was hostile, but also by turns charming, depressed, adorable, and vulnerable. I would love to see her play a lighter character.

Alice is not a good example on which to base your judgement of her as it's a very niche film, very stylized and quite frankly dreadful.

I TOTALLY agree with you
"Make love, not war. Unless you're Loki, which in that case: do what you want". ~ Tom Hiddleston

I agree that she is overrated. I wish they wouldn't cast her in any more adaptations of books, she is ruining all of my favorite stories. People wait years for new adaptations to come out, only to see incredibly poor results.