pschilling16 — 15 years ago(October 15, 2010 04:45 PM)

And that's just about the way it is when I read these comments about Sarah. Not to be misunderstood, there are several people out there that have honest and quite lovely things to say about her; although, there are "Those" people who either wants to compare her to someone else or have some kind of illerate post about what they think.
So let's all try this one on, k?
One does not become a model at 14-years of age and subsequently within a couple of years goes about "country hopping." I feel that where a lot of all of us are victimized by the typical Hollywood Starlet stereotype. Seriously, Hollywood for the longest time has been doing Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield, Janet Leigh, Isabella, Amanda Seyfried, Amanda Beard, Blake Lively, goodness the list is endless when we think of Meg Ryan, Katie Hudson, Grace Kelly, and every other blond bombshell with legs, legs, and more legs!
If one were to look at the facial features of the abovementioned ladies they are all very, very similar. And I am the first to admit that Sarah Roemer doesn't fit that mold. Sarah has a sophistication about her that is differen - that 'great-kind' of different. Just the way she rocks her head back and forth and her hair moves about 1/4 of an inch or her perfectly timed smiles and the degrees of her smiling; albeit, pursed, parsed, puckered, glance-smile, the 'I'm hot and know it' smile and her full smile - teeth and all.
There is absolutely nothing "ugly" about Sarah. Hell, check her portfolio out at l.a. models then tell us she's not attractive. Some folks like red roses, others like yellow roses, yet they're all roses nonetheless. Gr8 chemistry with Shia in Disturbia; moreover, she was believable. Cheers!
If at first you see your ship and it doesn't come in; don't just sit there, swim out to get it!