Raven-Symone said she'd move if Trump was NOMINATED.
The real reason these liberal women aren't moving is that, thanks to the liberal, anti-business policies of the dems, we don't have enough industrial sized cranes to "move" the women.

Is that hypocritical?
Very. Our border is supposed to be open so innocent, hard-working Mexicans can seek a better life for their children in America. Hogwash. Mexico's southern border with Guatemala is HEAVILY militarized and downright draconian. **** Mexico. They've been opportunistically exporting poverty, crime and other such undesirables to the US by taking advantage of weak, stupid, misguided liberals. I'm sick of it. Many others are. Hence, Trump wins.

I'm surprised Mexico and Canada don't have open borders or at least very liberal immigration laws. Isn't that what they wanted the United States to have? Is that hypocritical? Someone should ask Incest Baby Rapist her opinion on that.

Oh, is your Google broken? Or are you just one of those hypocrites who accepts the lies against Conservatives as truth but don't believe any of the truth how horrible dims are?
(We know the answer)
Maybe had you actually paid attention to everything going on the past 8 years instead of watching thousands of cr*ppy old movies, you wouldn't be such an idiot.
Don't worry, princess. I doubt you'll do more than just click on one or two of these links - if even that.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-hypocrisy-on-intelligence-briefings/2016/12/19/8b1fbed0-c5f4-11e6-bf4b-2c064d32a4bf_story.html?utm_term=.e22d03d068f1
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/obama_to_boehner_you_get_nothing_i_get_that_for_free/
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-its-like-when-president-obama-gets-mad-2015-3

• In case you missed this yesterday.

Doesn't surprise me that you ask for proof and when provided, you summarily dismis111cs it.

Oh, be patient, will you? I don't spend every minute of every day on the internet (only about 10 to 20 hours, tops) but I'm here now so let's get to it
"Oh, is your Google broken? Or are you just one of those hypocrites who accepts the lies against Conservatives as truth but don't believe any of the truth how horrible dims are?
(We know the answer)"
Yeah, my Google is broken. Well, actually it's on strike; it promises to work when I agree to stop using it for leprechaun porn. No, actually, I wanted to avoid any sites that cared more about demonizing Obama then presenting the facts. Because you have a disdain for bias media, I assumed that you would seer me in the right direction.
"Maybe had you actually paid attention to everything going on the past 8 years instead of watching thousands of cr*ppy old movies, you wouldn't be such an idiot."
Ain't republicans supposed to like old movies? A return to old values and all that?
Don't worry, princess. I doubt you'll do more than just click on one or two of these links - if even that.
Now don't be sad, 'cause two outta three ain't bad
Link numero uno: If I were there, I'd probably try to get Obama to attended more briefings. At least he did read the briefings in print (that fact is mentioned in the article in passing). Maybe Trump will do it the same way. Only time will tell on that
Link numero dose: Obama won a negotiation and saved the country from another wasteful Governmental shutdown?! Who does he think he is, Emperor Hirohito?!
Link numero trio: I can't believe that he got angry when important luggage was lost and to be very quiet about itI mean, isn't that just like a five year old? (Children are notorious for being very quiet. Especially when mad) and then to just go off and talk to the guy the way a boss talks to an employee! God, it's like he thinks he employed the man to preform certain services just because he, um, did. I think the most damning part was when he offered the candy he wasn't going to eat to his assistant. You know how else gave people candy? DEAN CORLL?!
So, I can see why there would be some concern over not attending briefings, but I'm a little perplexed by the other two.

Oh, is your Google broken? Or are you just one of those hypocrites who accepts the lies against Conservatives as truth but don't believe any of the truth how horrible dims are?
(We know the answer)
Maybe had you actually paid attention to everything going on the past 8 years instead of watching thousands of cr*ppy old movies, you wouldn't be such an idiot.
Don't worry, princess. I doubt you'll do more than just click on one or two of these links - if even that.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-hypocrisy-on-intelligence-briefings/2016/12/19/8b1fbed0-c5f4-11e6-bf4b-2c064d32a4bf_story.html?utm_term=.e22d03d068f1
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/obama_to_boehner_you_get_nothing_i_get_that_for_free/
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-its-like-when-president-obama-gets-mad-2015-3

Uh, no. I mean support for your claims.

Why do I need to support the lies you are telling?

"But, don't worry. We don't expect someone like you to know these things. You just simply spew the lies you heard and believe them to be true."
In my defense those lies are very well constructed; they went out of their way to put these lies on video and Trump's Twitter account so as to REALLY throw us off. Is there any video evidence or anything of the sort that might confirm your claims, if so, where can I find them?

Thank you for confirming what everyone knew. You are simply a biased moron who didn't bother to pay attention for the past 8 years.
On more than one occasion, he got into during intelligence briefings. If some mission/policy wasn't going his way, he'd yell at the generals/advisers or simply leave the meeting.
When Boehner gave in on the sequester in order to compromise, he asked what he got in return. 0bama yelled "I get this for free! You get this for nothing!"
Bush was no saint, but after the war dragged on he stopped playing golf and limited his vacations to his ranch down in TX. That way he was only a couple of hours away from DC and wasn't mucking things up for people who might be taking their first vacation to NY or HI.
But, don't worry. We don't expect someone like you to know these things. You just simply spew the lies you heard and believe themb68 to be true.

What are they?

And I'm sure you won't be able to find one thing in which 0bama acted like a petulant child either.

Yeah, from doing impressions of his opponents complete with spastic arm-waving, to calling everyone a looser and ending Tweets with sad. There's nothing childish about Trump.

No, we just got rid of the petulant child and made sure we didn't get the screeching harpie.

"They need to be treated like children."
Then it seems strange that conservatives would vote for a child.

But there are smart liberals, aren't there? It's never been proven that "the smarter someone is, the more likely they are to be conservative!"
Actually I agree. What some confuse with classic liberalism is progressivism.
I disagree with liberals, but I can understand their positions. They used to stand for the common man and the typical bigger government.
The problem is, now the hippies and other weirdos have taken over the Democrat party and has gone from the common man to the far left issues, such as gay rights, LBTQ issues such as wanting trannies to use women's bathrooms, and so many stupid issues. If you listen to John F. Kennedy's past speeches he would be a Republican right now.
It's the progressives like Dunham who are the truly repugnant and stupid.
I won't argue who is smarter, but I think some studies have compared IQ, etc.
Smart liberals? I am not a huge Joe Biden fan, and not sure how smart he is, but some of his comments after Hitlary's loss has shown he is smart enough to realize how bad her campaign was. I am sure a few more but I can't think of any right now.

But there are smart liberals, aren't there?
Not really. They are more emotional driven, so they rush to judgement or refuse to pass judgement based upon emotions.
What you aren't doing is explaining why CONSERVATISM (as an idealogy) is SUPERIOR.
Slower to rush into things, think things through with logic, sticks closer to what the Founding Fathers intended for the country.

But there are smart liberals, aren't there? It's never been proven that "the smarter someone is, the more likely they are to be conservative!" And you aren't making any real dig at LIBERALISM, per se. Anyone can lob names on any group of people that they have issues with, that is easy. "All conservative238s are racist and war-mongering!" There, I just did it! Two can play at that game!
What you aren't doing is explaining why CONSERVATISM (as an idealogy) is SUPERIOR. I bet you won't even bother to try!

Amen to all that, and in addition to being dishonest and gutless, liberals are also at the maturity level of 12-year olds. They need to be treated like children.